2
$\begingroup$

We're currently working on perturbations within cosmology. There is something I have not heard before which has cropped up, that is: a reference to the term "the background equations".

Are these just the Friedmann equations, without any perturbations present?

The specific question which refers to this is:

Determine the values of $a_{0}$ and $\rho_{0}$ for $\epsilon=0$, the background equations.

Where:

$$ a(t)=a_{0}+\epsilon\delta{a_{1}}(t) $$ $$ \rho(t)=\rho_{0}+\epsilon\delta{\rho_{1}}(t) $$

So, yes, just what are the background equations?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ No idea in this context so I can't provide an answer for sure, but it could just be talking about the mean equations -- when you introduce the perturbations, if you collect all the mean terms together you get a set of equations for those and when you collect all the perturbed terms together, you get the perturbation equation. And I think that is what the question is implying -- when you do the perturbation and set $\epsilon = 0$, you get something called the background equations in terms of $a_0$ and $\rho_0$. $\endgroup$
    – tpg2114
    Commented Feb 23, 2016 at 11:37
  • $\begingroup$ Do you think we are then setting these as constants so any derivatives of them would be 0? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 23, 2016 at 11:39
  • $\begingroup$ Again, no idea how this works in your field. I'm just speaking from a perturbation analysis standpoint in general. The time derivatives would be zero, yes. Any others (spatial) may not be -- but based on the notation, there is no spatial variation. The question seems to imply that you can find values for $a_0$ and $\rho_0$ when you do the perturbation analysis, collect all the mean terms together, set $\epsilon = 0$ and the time derivatives of $a_0$ and $\rho_0$ to 0. $\endgroup$
    – tpg2114
    Commented Feb 23, 2016 at 12:16

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

The word "background" is essentially jargon used to describe the zeroth order terms in perturbation theory.

In general, you can write the metric and stress-energy tensor as \begin{eqnarray} g_{\mu\nu} &=& \bar{g}_{\mu\nu} + \epsilon h_{\mu\nu} \\ T_{\mu\nu} &=& \bar{T}_{\mu\nu} + \epsilon \tau_{\mu\nu} \end{eqnarray} Then the "background" equations of motion are the Einstein equations and conservation of stress-energy when $\epsilon=0$ \begin{eqnarray} \bar{G}_{\mu\nu} &=& 8 \pi G_N \bar{T}_{\mu\nu} \\ \bar{\nabla}_\mu \bar{T}^{\mu\nu}&=&0 \end{eqnarray} So far it probably looks like we haven't done much, but the point of perturbation theory is to start with a background $\bar{g}_{\mu\nu}$ that you know solves the Einstein equations. In cosmology, this indeed means that the background metric is an FLRW metric (with an appropriate isotropic and homogenous stress-energy describing the matter).

The first order perturbation equations then can be computed by plugging the form of the metric and stress-energy tensor into Einstein's equations and expanding to linear order in $\epsilon$. However, I should warn you, that these equations are a huge mess in general.

On the other hand, because there is a lot of symmetry in the FLRW background (and, realistically, a lot of symmetry in any exact background solution you're likely to come across), you can do better than just plugging $\bar{g}_{\mu\nu} + \epsilon h_{\mu\nu}$ directly into Einstein's equations. Typically you decompose the metric perturbation $h_{\mu\nu}$ and matter perturbation $\tau_{\mu\nu}$ into invariant components based on the symmetries of the background.

For FLRW, we make use of the rotational symmetry of the background. This lets us can decompose the metric perturbation into 4 scalar components, 2 transverse (spatial) vector components, and a transverse-traceless (spatial) tensor component. As a sanity check, note 4 scalars = 4 degrees of freedom, 2 transverse vectors = 4 degrees of freedom, and a transverse-traceless tensor = 2 degrees of freedom, and 4+4+2=10 is the right number of degrees of freedom for the metric perturbation $h_{\mu\nu}$. There are additionally 4 gauge symmetries associated with general coordinate invariance that you will fix to reduce the number of degrees of freedom; exactly how this is done depends on what you want to do, and different books will make different choices, so I am just flagging that this will come up and will leave it to your book to explain it in more detail. One major advantage of this decomposition is that (to order $\epsilon$) the equations for the scalar, vector, and tensor components decouple, which means they can be treated independently.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I think he's on about the equations that govern the general evidence we have for how the cosmos is. Such as the 3K CMB radiation, red shift and some others.

3K background

For the CMB, we the image that you have probably seen. This is Planck's radiation law, that says the temperature is proportion the the square of the angular frequency of the radiation.

$ T $ ~ $\nu^{2} $ A more in depth view is found here

Red Shift This notion is understood the Doppler effect, which is essentially the addition of velocity vectors and it's effect on the frequency. There is a relativistic treatment but the standard is:

$ f = \frac{c + v_{r}}{c + v_{s}} f_{0} $

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.