3
$\begingroup$

I was reading the paper device independent outlook on quantum mechanics. The author defines a generic two qubit density matrix as $$ \rho=\frac{1}{4}\left( I \otimes I + \vec{r_{\rho}} \cdot \vec{\sigma}\otimes I + I \otimes \vec{s_{\rho}} \cdot \vec{\sigma} + \sum_{i,j=x,y,z}T^{ij}_{\rho} \sigma_i \otimes \sigma_j \right) \, . \tag{1} $$

How is it obtained and what are the constraints over $T^{ij}_{\rho}$ ? Also, seeing that it has some symmetry can a general 3 qubit density matrix be written as

\begin{align} \rho = \frac{1}{8} &\left( I \otimes I \otimes I + \vec{r_{\rho}} \cdot \vec{\sigma} \otimes I \otimes I + I \otimes \vec{s_{\rho}}\cdot \vec{\sigma} \otimes I + I \otimes I \otimes \vec{t_{\rho}}.\vec{\sigma} \right. \\ &+ \sum_{i,j=x,y,z}T^{ij}_{\rho} \sigma_i \otimes \sigma_j \otimes I + \sum_{i,j=x,y,z}U^{ij}_{\rho} \sigma_i \otimes I \otimes \sigma_j \\ &\left. + \sum_{i,j=x,y,z}W^{ij}_{\rho} I \otimes \sigma_i \otimes \sigma_j +\sum_{i,j,k=x,y,z}X^{ij}_{\rho} \sigma_i \otimes \sigma_j \otimes \sigma_k \right) ? \end{align} Here $\vec{r_{\rho}}, \vec{s_{\rho}}, and \vec{t_{\rho}}$ are 3 dimensional vectors with real components and each having magnitude $\le 1$.

EDIT:

I get the fact that tensor of pauli matrices acts as a basis but can't get the condition on $T_{ij}$. I was able to work backwards to see that $T_{\rho}^tT_{\rho}$ has to be such that its maximum eigen value is $\le 1$ so that CHSH inequality is only violated at maximum upto $2\sqrt{2}$. So if this condition is not followed then $(1)$ should not be a valid density matrix. The form given in $(1)$ is already hermitian and has trace 1. So for $T_{\rho}^tT_{\rho}$ having maximum eigen value $\ge1$ $(1)$ might not be a positive operator but I am unable to prove that.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What is your question? The conditions on $T$ for 2 qubits or the form of the density matrix for general qubits (and if the latter, what exactly is your question)? $\endgroup$ – Norbert Schuch Jun 16 '15 at 6:51
  • $\begingroup$ @NorbertSchuch Yes I am looking for conditions on matrix $T$. The single condition I know about it that maximum eigen value of $T^tT$ should be 1 and I cannot prove even that condition. So basically my question if what conditions are imposed on $T$ if (1) is a valid density matrix. $\endgroup$ – sashas Jun 16 '15 at 8:13
  • $\begingroup$ Talking about the eigenvalues of $T$ probably does not give a criterion: $T$ does not even have to be diagonalizable; and conversely, one can easily write an upper triangular $T$ with zero diagonal (i.e. eigenvalues $0$) which does not describe a positive $\rho$. $\endgroup$ – Norbert Schuch Jun 18 '15 at 18:55
5
+50
$\begingroup$

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9607007 discusses necessary conditions on $T$ (more precisely, on its singular values) for $\rho$ to be positive. They don't seem to derive sufficient conditions, however.

The basic idea is that one can perform a rotation $U_A$ and $U_B$ on the two qubits, respectively, which correspondingly transforms $r\mapsto O_Ar$, $s\mapsto O_Bs$, and $T\mapsto O_A T O_B^T$. By choosing $O_A$ and $O_B$ which give the singular value decomposition of $T$, one finds that any $\rho$ in your form (1) can be replaced by one with a diagonal $T$, with the singular values of the original $T$ on the diagonal.

Now, one can use different "trial states" $\vert\psi\rangle$ and check if $\langle\psi\vert \rho\vert\psi\rangle\ge0$ (which is necessary for positivity of $\rho$). By using the Bell states (for which the $r$ and $s$ part vanish), one obtains non-trivial constraints on $T$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.