1
$\begingroup$

How do the eigenfunctions of the total angular momentum operator analytically look like?

I mean the operator is given by $J = L+S$ so the eigenfunctions have to be tensor-product states, right? Can we explicitely say what they are?

I should add that I am particularly interested in $L$ to be orbital angular momentum operator and $S$ the spin-operator for electrons.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ They're spherical harmonics and Pauli matrices eigenvectors. I don't think they can be represented together, since they are elements of very different vector spaces. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 22, 2015 at 3:28
  • $\begingroup$ for the example of $S=1/2$ take a look at Sakurai equation 3.8.64 $\endgroup$
    – Ali Moh
    Commented Mar 22, 2015 at 3:38
  • $\begingroup$ @QuantumBrick, they're only Pauli matrix eigenvectors for spin 1/2, not in general. $\endgroup$
    – hft
    Commented Mar 22, 2015 at 3:49
  • $\begingroup$ @hft I believe people have the tendency of calling them Pauli matrices for any dimension, as long as they form the desired representation. Sometimes I hear people calling them "generalized Pauli matrices", then they're not talking about SU(2). $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 22, 2015 at 4:01
  • $\begingroup$ @QuantumBrick, you should kindly inform those people who have that tendency that they are quite wrong. $\endgroup$
    – hft
    Commented Mar 22, 2015 at 4:06

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

How do the eigenfunctions of the total angular momentum operator analytically look like?

I mean the operator is given by $J = L+S$ so the eigenfunctions have to be tensor-product states, right? Can we explicitely say what they are?

The eigenfunctions of $J$ are going to be made up of linear combinations of tensor-product states of the eigenfunctions of $L$ and the eigenfunctions of $S$. In general, the linear combinations will involved more than just one tensor-product of the eigenfunctions of $L$ and $S$, however the "stretch-state" is the exception and is the starting point for constructing the others.

For example, if $L$ and $S$ are both spin 1/2 (yes, I know that $L$ usually stands for "orbital" angular momentum, but in this example $L$ and $S$ are both spin 1/2) then total $J$ can be either spin 1=|1/2+1/2| or spin 0=|1/2-1/2|. One of the eigenfunctions of $J=1$ is given by a tensor-product state $$ |1,1\rangle=|1/2,1/2\rangle\otimes|1/2,1/2\rangle\;, $$ which is the "stretch-state". The other states can be obtained by applying the lowering operator $$ J_- = L_{-}\otimes 1 +1\otimes S_{-}\;, $$ to the stretch-state and normalizing. E.g., we find (I'm putting in the square root of two on the LHS by hand to indicate that the RHS is not generated as a normalized state) $$ \sqrt{2}|1,0\rangle=|1/2,-1/2\rangle\otimes|1/2,1/2\rangle+|1/2,1/2\rangle\otimes|1/2,-1/2\rangle $$ and $$ |1,-1\rangle=|1/2,-1/2\rangle\otimes|1/2,-1/2\rangle\;. $$ And the $|0,0\rangle$ state is generated by creating a state with $J_z=0$ that is orthogonal to the $|1,0\rangle$ state. It is $$ \sqrt{2}|0,0\rangle=|1/2,-1/2\rangle\otimes|1/2,1/2\rangle-|1/2,1/2\rangle\otimes|1/2,-1/2\rangle\;. $$

So, you see that two $(|1,1\rangle$ and $|1,-1\rangle)$ of the eigenfunctions of J in this case are simple tensor-products of the eigenfunctions of L and S, and the other two $(|1,0\rangle$ and $|0,0\rangle)$ are linear combinations of more than one tensor-product of the eigenfunctions of L and S.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The trick is to expand one basis (say the uncoupled one with elements $\{\vert LM_L\rangle \vert SM_s\rangle:= \vert L M_L;SM_S\rangle \}$) in terms of another (say the coupled one with elements $\{\vert JM_J\rangle\}$.) The assumption is that the $\{\vert JM_J\rangle\}$ form a complete set in the sense that the identity $$ \hat 1=\sum_{JM_J}\vert JM_J\rangle \langle J M_J\vert\, . $$ Hence: \begin{align} \vert LM_L; S M_S\rangle= \sum_{J(M_J)}\vert JM_J\rangle \langle J M_J\vert LM_L;SM_S\rangle\, . \tag{1} \end{align} The overlap coefficients $\langle J M_J\vert L M_L;SM_S\rangle$ are known as Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, sometimes also written as $C^{JM_J}_{LM_L;SM_S}$ or variations on that theme. The coefficients are easiest to calculate from recursion relations but the recursion has been solved and the coefficients have been reduced to summation form ; the simplest cases are often tabulated.

The possible values of $J$ in the sum of Eq.(1) are in the range $L+S, L+S-1, L+S-2, \ldots, \vert L-S\vert$, often written more compactly as $L+S\le J\le \vert L-S\vert$.

In addition, since the total projection $\hat J_z=\hat L_z+\hat S_z$, the eigenvalue $M_J=M_L+M_S$, further restricting the summation in (1). This restricted sum is indicated with the parenthesis around $(M_J)$.

Because they are transition coefficients from one orthonormal basis to another, the CG coefficients satisfy a number of orthonormality conditions, such as $$ \sum_{J } \vert \langle JM_J\vert LM_L;S M_S\rangle \vert^2=1\, . $$ There are additional such formulae. Starting from $\langle JM_J\vert J’M’_{J}\rangle=\delta_{JJ’}\delta_{M_J M’_J}$ and inserting $$ \hat 1=\sum_{M_LM_S}\vert LM_L;SM_S\rangle \langle LM_L;SM_S\vert $$ one gets $$ \sum_{M_LM_S}\langle JM_J\vert L M_L;SM_S\rangle \langle LM_L;SM_s\vert J’M’_J\rangle=\delta_{JJ’}\delta_{M_JM’_J} $$ etc.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.