0
$\begingroup$

How do you find the uncertainties for $x$ and $K$? Knowing that the general uncertainties =

$$ \sigma_A \sigma_B \geq 1/2\int \psi ^*[\hat A,\hat B] \psi dx\, $$

I figured out the commutator, for some function f(x) $$ [\hat x,\hat K][f(x)]=(\hbar/m)(df/dx) $$

Then plugging into the integral I got

$$ \sigma_x \sigma_K \geq \hbar ^2/(2mi)\int_{-\infty} ^\infty f^*( x) (df/dx) dx\, $$

Is there anyway to further reduce this? Am I correctly approaching this?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Might be easier to consider $K=p^2/2m$. $\endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    Commented Sep 29, 2014 at 0:29

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

You are on the right track. Pushing one more step to the final answer may leave you disappointed: $\sigma_x \sigma_K$ can equal zero! To see this, I find it more helpful to think just in terms of $x$ and $K$ as linear operators satisfying certain commutation relations, rather than thinking explicitly in terms of integrals of wavefunctions.

Specifically, we have $K = \frac{p^2}{2m}$ and $[x,p] = i \hbar$. From these two equations it follows that \begin{eqnarray} [x,K] & = & \frac{1}{2m} [x,p^2] \\ & = & \frac{1}{2m} \left( [x,p]p + p[x,p] \right) \\ & = & \frac{1}{2m} \left( i \hbar p + p i \hbar \right) \\ & = & \frac{i \hbar}{m} p \end{eqnarray} So, for a state with zero momentum, the product $\sigma_x \sigma_K$ of uncertainties can be zero. This corresponds to the possibility that $\frac{df}{dx} = 0$ in your final equation. (The second equality in the above derivation uses the chain rule for commutators, which is a handy identity: For any operators $A$,$B$, and $C$ it holds that $[A,BC] = B[A,C] + [A,B]C$.)

It is only in the case that $[\hat{A},\hat{B}]$ is proportional to the identity that the state $\psi$ disappears from the right hand side of the general uncertainty relation $\sigma_A \sigma_B \geq 1/2 \int \psi^* [\hat{A}, \hat{B}] \psi dx$. The position and momentum operators have this relationship, as do any canonically conjugate pair. However, kinetic energy and position do not.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Just to clarify, so is there no "uncertainty principle" for kinetic energy and position like the way position and momentum do? Also, I'm wondering what is the physical meaning/significance of df/dx? $\endgroup$
    – Coburn
    Commented Sep 30, 2014 at 4:18
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that is correct. Kinetic energy and position do not obey the same kind of uncertainty relation that position and momentum do. I wouldn't say that df/dx necessarily has direct physical significance, but if f is the wavefunction then -i hbar df/dx is the momentum. $\endgroup$
    – StephenJ
    Commented Sep 30, 2014 at 15:21
0
$\begingroup$

You do it as follows :

$$[X,K]=\frac{1}{2m}[X,P^2]=\frac{1}{2m}\left(P[X,P]+[X,P]P\right)=\frac{i\hbar P}{m}$$

The general Uncertainty principle for operators $\Omega$ and $\Lambda$ is given by : $$(\Delta \Omega)^2(\Delta \Lambda)^2\geq\frac{1}{4}\langle\psi|[\hat{\Omega},\hat{\Lambda}]|\psi\rangle^2+\frac{1}{4}\langle\psi|\Gamma|\psi\rangle^2$$ where $[\hat{\Omega},\hat{\Lambda}]=i\Gamma$. The first term is positive and thus for any $|\psi\rangle$ $$(\Delta \Omega)^2(\Delta \Lambda)^2\geq\frac{1}{4}\langle\psi|\Gamma|\psi\rangle^2=\frac{\hbar^2 }{4m^2}\langle\psi|P|\psi\rangle^2=\frac{\hbar^2 }{4m^2}\langle P\rangle^2$$


Note that this might not be useful for case where $\langle P \rangle = 0$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.