5
$\begingroup$

Try this:

Make a cup of tea, add sugar, and stir it.

Now add some milk, while it's still spinning.

What I noticed is that the milk appears to move around a lot quicker in the middle of the cup of tea, than the outside.

This seems to be the opposite of what happens on a vinyl, though it's the same as what happens with planets orbiting the sun.

What's the explanation here?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I think the comparison with planets is not the best apology. I think you could better compare it with a hurricane or tornado. $\endgroup$ – fibonatic May 10 '14 at 13:05
  • $\begingroup$ Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/3244/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Aug 11 '14 at 7:58
4
$\begingroup$

Ultimately, the Navier-Stokes equations explain this :)

OK, that's not a useful answer: here's how they explain the phenomenon in some cases. Under steady state conditions for a fluid (inviscid, incompressible) that doesn't differ too much from a cup of tea, the Vorticity Transport Equation shows that the vorticity $\omega = \nabla \times \vec{v}$ (the curl of the velocity $\vec{v}$) tends to nought in the steady state, as discussed in more detail in this answer here.

So now we have a potential flow; since $\nabla\times\vec{v}\approx \vec{0}$ we can set $v = -\nabla \phi$ where $\phi$ is a potential function and, since the continuity equation for an incompressible, steady state flow behests that $\nabla\cdot\vec{v}=0$, we must have $\nabla^2\phi=0$. So we now search for an axisymmetric solution to Laplace's equation with concentric circles for flow lines. The complex potential for a 2D vortex is (See the Wikipedia page for "Potential Flow" ):

$$\Omega(z) = \frac{\Gamma}{2\,\pi\,i}\,\log z$$

where $z = x+i\,y$ is the 2D position in the flow and $\Gamma\in\mathbb{R}$ the circulation. The implied velocity field (as a complex number field) is:

$$V(z) = (\mathrm{d}_z \Omega)* = -\frac{\Gamma}{2\,\pi\,i\,z^*} = \frac{\Gamma}{2\,\pi\,r} i\,e^{i\,\theta}$$

where we now write the position vector in polar co-ordinates $(r,\theta)$ i.e. the velocity (in the direction of $i\,e^{i\,\theta}$ is at right angles to the position vector $r\,e^{i\,\theta}$, and the streamlines are concentric circles centred at the origin.

This of course goes a bit haywire at $r=0$ and of course the description breaks down for small values of $r$, but you can see it describes pretty well the phenomenon you see in your cup of tea.

So let's summarise the physics that is expressed in the above:

  1. The fluid evolves into a state where fluid particles have zero spin angular momentum and $\nabla\times\vec{v}=0$; they can of course have orbital angular momentum, as in a whirlpool;

  2. Given incompressibility, conservation of mass is expressed at steady state by $\nabla.\vec{v}=0$;

  3. These two conditions force a a potential flow: $\vec{v}=-\nabla\phi$ where $\phi$ is harmonic;

  4. Lastly, the problem's circular symmetry defines a unique harmonic function.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

If I understand correctly, the cup itself doesn’t rotate. In normal conditions it implies that linear velocity of the liquid at the boundary (the cup’s wall) equals to 0 (search for “no-slip condition” in Web for explanations). This is the main reason why the liquid moves “quicker in the middle”.

Also, if you stir your tea especially vigorously, you can form a vortex where the liquid near its center will move really a lot quicker. Such vortex has not necessarily be located at the center of the cup.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Indeed, "This of course goes a bit haywire at r=0". In fact the whole argument is just a trick to hide the fact that infinite vorticity has been inserted at the axis - see vortex. By stirring the tea you have introduced vorticity and hiding it in a singularity doesn't help. Nevertheless, "In the absence of external forces, a vortex usually evolves fairly quickly toward the irrotational flow pattern, where the flow velocity v is inversely proportional to the distance r. For that reason, irrotational vortices are also called free vortices."

The next question is - why?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.