In the first SuSy lecture last week following theory of two real scalar fields has been considered as a first example:
$$\mathcal{L}=(\partial_\mu \phi_1)^2/2+(\partial_\mu \phi_2)^2/2-m^2(\phi_1^2+\phi_2^2)/2$$
which has the usual equation of motion $$(\Box+m^2)\phi_i=0;\quad i=1,2$$ Then the professor has written down following conserved currents for this theory:
$$J^{(n)}_{\mu_1\dots\mu_n}=\partial_{\mu_1}\phi_2\partial_{\mu_2}\dots\partial_{\mu_n}\phi_1-\phi_2\partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_n}\phi_1$$
Using the equation of motion, it is easy to show that these currents are indeed conserved for all $n$.
As far as I can see, these are no Noether currents, at least I cannot see how to get something with arbitrary many indices using the standard formula for Noether currents; furthermore I don't see which symmetry of the Lagrangian they could reflect.
My questions now are:
Are there really no symmetries corresponding to these currents or do I overlook something? If there are no such symmetries and the formula for Noether's currents doesn't apply, is there any way to get such currents or is it rather an educated guess?
Is there any way to intuitively visualize such currents with many indices? Can anything be said about their physical meaning (if there is some)?