1
$\begingroup$

Viscosity of liquids decrease with temperature, but for gases, it increases with temperature. If both are fluids, shouldn't the trend be same for both of them?

As kinetic energy of fluid particles increases with temperature, there are more collisions between its particles since this is what is dealt with in thermodynamics(mean free path, collision number), so viscosity of a fluid should increase with temperature.

But I can't understand why this logic fails to apply to liquids. Any help in clarifying why we use different reasons to explain the temperature dependence of viscosity of gases and liquids would be highly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The Physical Causes section of the Wikipedia article on viscosity answers this question. $\endgroup$
    – Farcher
    Commented Sep 14 at 5:44
  • $\begingroup$ @Farcher, I wanted to know the reason as to why there are $2$ different reasons to explain the temperature dependence of viscosity of liquids and gases. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 14 at 6:46
  • $\begingroup$ See chapter 1 of Transport Phenoma by Bird et al. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 14 at 9:59

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

The difference between the two processes which result in viscosity is down to how molecules interact with one another.

In a gas the interactions between molecules, which are relatively far apart, are primarily via collisions and the "nearest neighbours$ change all the time.
In a liquid the the interactions between the molecules, with a spacing roughly the size of a molecule, are via bonds between the molecules and although nearest neighbours do change that happens relatively slowly as compared to molecules in a liquid.

The different mechanisms are described in the Physical Causes section of the Wikipedia article Viscosity as follows:
Viscosity in gases arises from molecules traversing layers of flow and transferring momentum between layers. This transfer of momentum can be thought of as a frictional force between layers of flow. Since the momentum transfer is caused by free motion of gas molecules between collisions, increasing thermal agitation of the molecules results in a larger viscosity. Hence, gaseous viscosity increases with temperature. In liquids, viscous forces are caused by molecules exerting attractive forces on each other across layers of flow. Increasing temperature results in a decrease in viscosity because a larger temperature means particles have greater thermal energy and are more easily able to overcome the attractive forces binding them together. An everyday example of this viscosity decrease is cooking oil moving more fluidly in a hot frying pan than in a cold one.

Thus for gases as the temperature rises the molecules move faster and thus transfer momentum (information about themselves) quicker whereas in a liquid the increased kinetic energy the molecules at a higher temperature, "vibrate" more, which results in it being easier for one layer of liquid to slip past an adjacent layer.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Viscosity resists an increase in distance between atoms or molecules. In a gas in a container any one molecule trying to push others apart meets more resistance at the front when temperature is higher because there are more moving gas molecules hitting it per unit time. When rain falls you get wetter at the front than the back if you run through it and faster rain makes you wetter still. In a liquid fewer molecules will hit any one molecule per unit time because the molecules spread apart further as temperature rises.The rain is less dense.

$\endgroup$
9
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Rakshith PL. The front means the direction in which the atom or molecule is travelling and the back is the direction it is moving away from. This is an analogy I am using from Richard Feynman who applied this logic to particles approaching Earth from the front and back in relation to alternative theories of gravity. Feynman said Earth would be slowed down because the front hits more incoming particles per unit time than the back. $\endgroup$
    – user429115
    Commented Sep 17 at 7:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Rakshith. PL. Imagine the molecules are orderly like sheets of evenly distributed raindrops. The quicker any one molecule moves forward the more sheets it passes through per unit time and the more collisions. $\endgroup$
    – user429115
    Commented Sep 17 at 7:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Rakshith PL. No because the molecule is moving away from sheets behind it. The result is more net force on the front compared to the back . $\endgroup$
    – user429115
    Commented Sep 17 at 7:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The average net force of collision is greater for higher temperatures and faster moving molecules.And this means viscosity or resistance to the single moving molecule is higher. $\endgroup$
    – user429115
    Commented Sep 17 at 8:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Rakshith PL. Intermolecular Bond lengths increase and the force of attraction between molecules decreases. So any molecule pushing between the others finds it easier . $\endgroup$
    – user429115
    Commented Sep 17 at 8:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.