0
$\begingroup$

Consider an orthonormal set $|\psi_n\rangle$ in the energy basis. Clearly $\langle\psi_n|\psi_m\rangle=\delta_{m,n}$. Does this tell me anything about $\langle\psi_n|\hat{X}|\psi_m\rangle$ or for that matter $|\langle\psi_n|\psi_m\rangle|^2$?

The logical part of my brain is saying no, but the handwavy wavy intuition part of my brain that occasionally is necessary for solving some homework problems says yes. I should be able to say something about $|\psi_n\rangle$'s in the x basis.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

For $\langle \psi_n | X |\psi_m\rangle$ you can't assume anything. These are totally free.

But $|\langle \psi_n |\psi_m\rangle|^2=\langle \psi_n |\psi_m\rangle \overline{\langle \psi_n |\psi_m\rangle} = \delta_{mn}^2=\delta_{mn}$

Note for clarity that there is no sum in the second expression despite repeated indices. Also, the first equality comes from $|z|^2 = z \bar{z}$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I didn't mean $|\langle\psi_n|\psi_m\rangle|^2$. Oops! However, I realized that what I was thinking of didn't make any sense when I go to write it out correctly! Anyway, Thanks again! $\endgroup$
    – EEH
    Commented Apr 25, 2023 at 23:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.