4
$\begingroup$

Let $H = H_0 + H_I$ be a Hamiltonian that is the sum of a free Hamiltonian and an interacting Hamiltonian. Denote the free vacuum state by $| 0 \rangle$ and the full vacuums state by $|\Omega \rangle$. The $S$ matrix is computed as $$\langle p_1\ldots p_n | S | p_{n+1}\ldots p_N\rangle = \langle 0 | a_{p_1}\ldots a_{p_n} S a^\dagger_{p_{n+1}}\ldots a^\dagger_{p_N} | 0 \rangle.$$ However scattering by definition involves interactions of particles, so why does the above use $|0\rangle$ and not $|\Omega\rangle$?

The motivation for this question came from studying the LSZ formula, which relates the $S$ matrix (using free vacuum states) to the Gell-Mann-Low formula (which is defined using the interacting vacuums state).

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

We calculate scattering matrix in order to take interactions into account. Scattering matrix calculation for scattering problems is like perturbation theory for eigenvalue problems - we attack the complex interacting problem using solvable non-interacting problem as the starting point.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ So in principle it should be $| \Omega \rangle$ but because we don't have much information about that we express it in terms of $|0\rangle$? $\endgroup$
    – CBBAM
    Commented Mar 7, 2023 at 19:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You need to check carefully the derivation - one actually starts with projecting the full interacting particle states onto each other (incoming onto outgoing), and then converts into interaction representation - your scattering matrix in the OP is already the final form. $\endgroup$
    – Roger V.
    Commented Mar 7, 2023 at 19:19
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, I think I understand now. $\endgroup$
    – CBBAM
    Commented Mar 7, 2023 at 20:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.