4
$\begingroup$

I came across this question while reading Chapter 15 of Conformal Field Theory by Di Francesco.

So the action of the Weiss-Zumino-Witten(WZW) model is as follows:

$$S = \frac{1}{4a^2}\int d^2x {\rm Tr}'(\partial^{\mu}g^{-1}\partial_\mu g) + k\Gamma$$

where $g$ is in some representation of Lie Group $G$ and $\Gamma$ is the Weiss-Zumino-Witten term. The action is invariant under the transformation

$$g \rightarrow \Omega_1 g \Omega_2$$

where $\Omega_{1,2}$ belongs to $G$. So it has symmetry $G\times G$. But, it later pointed out that due to the holomorphic factorization of the $g$ field, this symmetry is actually to $G(z)\times G(\bar{z})$.

My question is, this enlargement from a global symmetry to a local symmetry is reminicent of gauge symmetry. But I think things are here are a bit different because here the symmetry is not a redundancy. Is there a way to make this contrast/comparison between symmetry in WZW model to gauge symmetry more precise? Is it because some special properties of gauge transformations in 2d?

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

This enlargement of symmetry is related to gauge symmetry in the following way.

It was realised by Witten [1], and further developed in [2] (see also this physics SE answer and the standard Chern-Simons reference [3]), that you can view a WZW model with fields $g:\Sigma\to G$, as the boundary theory for a $G_k\times G_{-k}$ Chern-Simons theory ($k$ is the level), on $M$ where $\partial M = \Sigma$. Chern-Simons has a $G\times G$ gauge symmetry. When you place it on a manifold with a boundary and impose holomorphic and anti-holomorphic boundary conditions, the gauge transformations that do not vanish on the boundary become global symmetries. In particular, they give rise to an $\mathfrak{g}_k\oplus\bar{\mathfrak{g}}_k$ current algebra. This is the infinite algebra whose conserved charges correspond to integrals of the holomorphic/anti-holomorphic conserved currents times arbitrary holomorphic/anti-holomorphic functions.


References:

[1]: E. Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial

[2]: D.C.Cabra, G.L.Rossini , Explicit connection between conformal field theory and 2+1 Chern-Simons theory, arXiv:hep-th/9506054

[3]: S. Elitzur, G. W. Moore, A. Schwimmer, and N. Seiberg, Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 326 (1989) 108–134 (pdf without paywall).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.