Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1598240504638062593
added 13 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.7k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k

I came across this question while reading Chapter 15 of Conformal Field Theory by Di Francesco.

So the action of the Weiss-Zumino-Witten(WZW) model is as follows:

$S = \frac{1}{4a^2}\int d^2x \rm{Tr}'(\partial^{\mu}g^{-1}\partial_\mu g) + k\Gamma$$$S = \frac{1}{4a^2}\int d^2x {\rm Tr}'(\partial^{\mu}g^{-1}\partial_\mu g) + k\Gamma$$

where g$g$ is in some representation of Lie Group G$G$ and $\Gamma$ is the Weiss-Zumino-Witten term. The action is invariant under the transformation

$g \rightarrow \Omega_1 g \Omega_2$$$g \rightarrow \Omega_1 g \Omega_2$$

where $\Omega_{1,2}$ belongs to G$G$. So it has symmetry $G\times G$. But, it later pointed out that due to the holomorphic factorization of the g$g$ field, this symmetry is actually to $G(z)\times G(\bar{z})$.

My question is, this enlargement from a global symmetry to a local symmetry is reminicent of gauge symmetry. But I think things are here are a bit different because here the symmetry is not a redundancy. Is there a way to make this contrast/comparison between symmetry in WZW model to gauge symmetry more precise? Is it because some special properties of gauge transformations in 2d?

I came across this question while reading Chapter 15 of Conformal Field Theory by Di Francesco.

So the action of the Weiss-Zumino-Witten(WZW) model is as follows:

$S = \frac{1}{4a^2}\int d^2x \rm{Tr}'(\partial^{\mu}g^{-1}\partial_\mu g) + k\Gamma$

where g is in some representation of Lie Group G and $\Gamma$ is the Weiss-Zumino-Witten term. The action is invariant under the transformation

$g \rightarrow \Omega_1 g \Omega_2$

where $\Omega_{1,2}$ belongs to G. So it has symmetry $G\times G$. But, it later pointed out that due to the holomorphic factorization of the g field, this symmetry is actually to $G(z)\times G(\bar{z})$.

My question is, this enlargement from a global symmetry to a local symmetry is reminicent of gauge symmetry. But I think things are here are a bit different because here the symmetry is not a redundancy. Is there a way to make this contrast/comparison between symmetry in WZW model to gauge symmetry more precise? Is it because some special properties of gauge transformations in 2d?

I came across this question while reading Chapter 15 of Conformal Field Theory by Di Francesco.

So the action of the Weiss-Zumino-Witten(WZW) model is as follows:

$$S = \frac{1}{4a^2}\int d^2x {\rm Tr}'(\partial^{\mu}g^{-1}\partial_\mu g) + k\Gamma$$

where $g$ is in some representation of Lie Group $G$ and $\Gamma$ is the Weiss-Zumino-Witten term. The action is invariant under the transformation

$$g \rightarrow \Omega_1 g \Omega_2$$

where $\Omega_{1,2}$ belongs to $G$. So it has symmetry $G\times G$. But, it later pointed out that due to the holomorphic factorization of the $g$ field, this symmetry is actually to $G(z)\times G(\bar{z})$.

My question is, this enlargement from a global symmetry to a local symmetry is reminicent of gauge symmetry. But I think things are here are a bit different because here the symmetry is not a redundancy. Is there a way to make this contrast/comparison between symmetry in WZW model to gauge symmetry more precise? Is it because some special properties of gauge transformations in 2d?

Source Link

Relation between WZW model and gauge transformation

I came across this question while reading Chapter 15 of Conformal Field Theory by Di Francesco.

So the action of the Weiss-Zumino-Witten(WZW) model is as follows:

$S = \frac{1}{4a^2}\int d^2x \rm{Tr}'(\partial^{\mu}g^{-1}\partial_\mu g) + k\Gamma$

where g is in some representation of Lie Group G and $\Gamma$ is the Weiss-Zumino-Witten term. The action is invariant under the transformation

$g \rightarrow \Omega_1 g \Omega_2$

where $\Omega_{1,2}$ belongs to G. So it has symmetry $G\times G$. But, it later pointed out that due to the holomorphic factorization of the g field, this symmetry is actually to $G(z)\times G(\bar{z})$.

My question is, this enlargement from a global symmetry to a local symmetry is reminicent of gauge symmetry. But I think things are here are a bit different because here the symmetry is not a redundancy. Is there a way to make this contrast/comparison between symmetry in WZW model to gauge symmetry more precise? Is it because some special properties of gauge transformations in 2d?