It is well-known that 2d global conformal invariance constrains the 2, 3-point functions to some very simple form, and 4-point function must be $$ f(\eta, \bar \eta) \prod_{i < j}z_{ij}^{...} \bar z_{ij}^{...} $$ where $\eta$ is the harmonic cross ratio.
The derivation of the above results relies on the conformal Ward identity, for example the infinitesimal one $$ \delta_\epsilon \langle X \rangle = - \sum_{i} \epsilon(w)\partial_{w_i} + \partial \epsilon(w) h_i \ , $$ and the fact that $\delta_\epsilon \langle X \rangle = 0$ when $\epsilon$ is a generator of the global conformal transformations.
But what about local conformal transformations? Can we place some constraints on the correlation functions by looking at the local ones? I can think of some possibilities.
In Di Francesco's book, the global conformal transformations are referred to as "real symmetry" (above eq (5.49)), and perhaps the local ones aren't real symmetry, and shouldn't be considered in this context.
Even if one consider the local ones, $\delta_\epsilon \langle X\rangle$ depends on the chosen $X$, and therefore no universal statement can be made.