1
$\begingroup$

In magnetostatics theory, the magnetic field of any magnetic body with magnetization $\mathbf M$ is equivalent to that of a volume current density $\mathbf J_{m,v}$ and a surface current density $\mathbf J_{m,s}$ with the following relations:

$$\mathbf J_{m,v} = \nabla \times \mathbf M \\ \mathbf J_{m,s} = \mathbf M \times \mathbf n$$

In defining the magnetic field intensity (aka, auxiliary magnetic field) $\mathbf H$ it is assumed that only the volume magnetization current density $\mathbf J_{m,v}$ contributes to the free current $\mathbf J_f$: (See D.K Cheng, Field and Wave Electromagnetics)

$$\nabla \times \frac{\mathbf B}{\mu_0} = \mathbf J_f + \nabla \times \mathbf M \\ \nabla \times \left(\frac{\mathbf B}{\mu_0} - \mathbf M \right) = \mathbf J_f $$

However all the three sources $\mathbf J_{f}$, $\mathbf J_{m,v}$ and $\mathbf J_{m,s}$ should contribute to the magnetic field. I cannot see how the surface current is included.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The surface magnetization current is accounted for by the magnetization current term $\nabla \times \mathbf M$. On a boundary between the medium and vacuum, the term $\nabla \times \mathbf M$ is singular; when integrated over an arbitrarily small line normal to the boundary passing through the boundary, we get value $\mathbf M\times \mathbf n$, which is thus the surface current per unit length on the boundary.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.