1
$\begingroup$

In an article from the reference there are following words (page 2): "...pressure P is a Lorentz invariant... the result follows from standart properties of the relativistic stress-energy tensor...".

What properties are used by the authors of an article?

For example, I used the expression for stress-energy tensor of an isotropic body: $$ T_{\alpha \beta} = (\varepsilon + p)\frac{v_{\alpha }v_{\beta}}{c^{2}} - g_{\alpha \beta }p. $$ If pressure is determined as a 3-trace of this tensor, it's obviously that it isn't Lorentz invariant.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I don;t really understand your question, but isn't the trace of a tensor an invariant ? $\endgroup$
    – FraSchelle
    Commented Jun 29, 2013 at 17:26
  • $\begingroup$ 4-trace is invariant, but 3-trace is not invariant. $\endgroup$
    – user8817
    Commented Jun 29, 2013 at 17:31

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I think the pressure here is "defined" by the expression for the stress-energy tensor you wrote down, or equivalently, by $$ p \equiv \frac{1}{3}\left(\frac{v_{\alpha}v_{\beta}}{c^{2}}T^{\alpha\beta}-T^{\alpha}\!{}_{\alpha}\right). $$ My guess is that you probably would have been happier if the author had called this quantity "the pressure in the (locally) comoving frame".

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ So, you write about scalar $p$ which is a pressure ($T_{ii}$ component) in a case of rest frame? $\endgroup$
    – user8817
    Commented Jun 30, 2013 at 11:24
  • $\begingroup$ @PhysiXxx Right, with a caveat that the rest frame is only defined locally because the velocity of the fluid is in general dependent on position and time. $\endgroup$
    – higgsss
    Commented Jun 30, 2013 at 12:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.