0
$\begingroup$

Why is it that the SHO/SHM solution $$u(x)=H(x)\,e^{-x^2/2},\quad \Psi(x,t)=u(x)\,e^{-iEt/\hbar}$$ with $$H_n (x)=\sum_k^na_kx^k \tag{Hermite Polynomials}$$ is valid even when $x$ (displacement from equilibrium) becomes very large, in which case $H_n(x) \propto x^n$?

Isn't the Taylor expansion of the potential $$V(x_0+\delta x)\approx V(x_0)+\left.\frac{1}{2}\frac{d^2V}{dx^2}\right|_{x_0}(\delta x)^2$$ only valid for when $\delta x$ is small?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ The SHO is defined as the system for which Hooke's law is exact. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 24, 2021 at 12:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Connor Of course it is, but the OP is asking, broadly, how the asymptotics of SHO solutions mesh with larger excursions from equilibrium in an imperfectly harmonic potential! $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 24, 2021 at 15:46
  • $\begingroup$ Is this what you are asking? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 24, 2021 at 15:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In all fairness, the wavefunction never becomes very large, by dint of the suppression of the exponential prefactor. Large-x regions contribute very little to the energy, etc., as you might check. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 25, 2021 at 20:02

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

There are no approximations made in this solution.

The potential is exactly a quadratic. So, in the simple quantum harmonic oscillator system, you don't need to do the expansion of the potential you mention at the end of your question; it simply is exactly a quadratic.

There can be some confusion because people often say things like "this dip in X funny-looking potential is quadratic for small deviations from the middle of the dip," but the QHO is in an exactly quadratic potential, so it looks quadratic arbitrarily far from the middle.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ But.. how is discussion of the SHO going to address the question which is about departures from harmonicity? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 24, 2021 at 15:50
  • $\begingroup$ I did not interpret the question that way. OP explicitly says "in the SHO system." $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 24, 2021 at 15:57
  • $\begingroup$ No, he is not restricting his problem to the SHO: why bother asking anything there? He is asking why he is allowed to apply SHO solutions extending to large distances to the small excursions dictated by his TISE proximation. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 24, 2021 at 16:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I guess we'll have to hear from OP, but I did not interpret the question that way. The answer seems trivial to "experts", but these types of confusions (specifically, not recognizing when one needs to make the approximation given in the question and what its effects are) are common for students. That is why someone might "bother asking anything there." $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 24, 2021 at 16:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.