0
$\begingroup$

In the book of Acheson, it is stated that the material derivative $\frac{D\vec u}{Dt}$ can be considered as an acceleration of a "fluid element" - which is something the author never defined, but my understanding is that a "fluid element" is a physical volume that moves with the streamline it started with such that the fluid particles contained in that volume at any given become the corresponding "fluid element".

However, they also mention that (see exercise 1.8) that when the flow is unsteady, the particle trajectories will not be the same as the streamlines. So, does this mean that the concept of acceleration for a fluid element via $\frac{D\vec u}{Dt}$ is only meaningful and defined for a steady-flow?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You just have to change your "definition" : a "fluid element" is a physical volume that moves along the pathline. (But this is the definition of a pathline !)

It is simply necessary to follow a material particle of fluid between $t$ and $t + dt$ along its trajectory (pathline). the key point is to note that the velocity of a fluid material particle at time $t$ is the velocity field where the particle is at time $t$. And when time changes, the particle changes location. It is therefore necessary to take into account the variations of the velocity field in time but also in space.

What the material derivative shows is that even when the velocity field is not time dependent, a fluid particle moves within the velocity field and therefore can have non-zero acceleration.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ you used "the" for pathline. Which pathline are you talking about? As you also indicated, if this is the definition of a pathline, then there is a circular logic, which doesn't make any sense! $\endgroup$
    – Our
    Commented Aug 19, 2021 at 13:38
  • $\begingroup$ I have completed the explanation to be more clear. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 19, 2021 at 14:55
  • $\begingroup$ thanks a lot for the answer. Just out of curiosity, is there a fluid mechanics book that you can suggest? $\endgroup$
    – Our
    Commented Aug 19, 2021 at 16:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is a very rich and difficult subject with a lot of good books published. Everyone brings something. For example, you could take a look at "Physics of continuous matter" by B Lautrup. It concerns all the mechanics of continuous media and addresses many themes. But, as always in physics do not believe that reading such a book is "easy"! $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 19, 2021 at 17:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.