1
$\begingroup$

I think this might be a fairly "trivial" question.

Given a block diagonal unitary $$\hat{U} = \sum_{\alpha=0}^N \hat{U}_\alpha$$ (where $\hat{U}_\alpha$ is a matrix of all zeros apart from a $k_\alpha\times k_\alpha$ unitary subspace),

we can say $\hat{U}_\alpha = \hat{U}_\alpha \Pi_\alpha$, where $\Pi_\alpha$ is a projection operator onto the $\alpha$-th subspace.

My question is this: if we evolve any density operator through $\hat{U}$ is it correct to assume that the final state will be always block diagonal?

My reasoning is quite simple: given a density operator $$\sigma^0 = \sum_{\eta=0}^dp_\eta |{\phi_\eta}\rangle \langle{\phi'_\eta}|$$ evolving it through $\hat{U}$ means $$\sigma^f = \hat{U}\sigma^0\hat{U}^\dagger = \sum_{\alpha=0}^N \hat{U}_\alpha \Pi_\alpha\sigma^0\Pi_\alpha\hat{U}_\alpha^\dagger = \sum_{\alpha=0}^N \hat{U}_\alpha \sigma_\alpha^0 \hat{U}_\alpha^\dagger $$

where $\sum_\alpha^N \sigma^0_\alpha$ is a block diagonal operator comprised of non-normalized density operators $\sigma_\alpha$. Henceforth $\sigma^f$ will be block diagonal.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

This is not true. The easiest way to see this is to find a counter example, so if $$ U = \left(\begin{array}{cccc} 1 &0&0&0\\ 0 &\cos\phi & \sin \phi & 0 \\ 0 &-\sin\phi & \cos \phi & 0 \\ 0&0&0&1 \end{array}\right) $$ and $$ \rho = \left(\begin{array}{cccc} a&b&0&0\\ b^* & c &0&0\\ 0&0&d&e\\ 0&0&e^*&f \end{array}\right) $$ then $$ U \rho U^\dagger = \left(\begin{array}{cccc} a & b\cos\phi & -b\sin\phi&0\\ b^*\cos\phi & c\cos^2\phi+d\sin^2\phi& (d-c)\sin\phi\cos\phi&e\sin\phi\\ -b^*\sin\phi& (d-c)\sin\phi\cos\phi& c\sin^2\phi+d\cos^2\phi&e\cos\phi\\ 0&e^*\sin\phi&e^*\cos\phi&f \end{array}\right) $$ which is clearly not block diagonal.

The mistake in your reasoning is that $$ U\sigma^0U^\dagger = \sum_\alpha \sum_\beta U_\alpha\Pi_\alpha \sigma^0 \Pi_\beta U_\beta^\dagger \ne \sum_\alpha U_\alpha\Pi_\alpha \sigma^0 \Pi_\alpha U_\alpha^\dagger. $$ The only case where that step would be valid would be if $$ \Pi_\alpha \sigma^0 \Pi_\beta\propto \delta_{\alpha\beta} $$ that is in the case that $\sigma^0$ is already block diagonal, with the same blocks as $U$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ so if $\sigma⁰$ had to be diagonal, then the off-diagonal term $\Pi_\alpha\sigma^0\Pi_\beta$ would be zero, right? $\endgroup$
    – Oti
    Commented Aug 24, 2021 at 16:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.