2
$\begingroup$

One can derive the Schrodinger equation as follows:

$U(\delta t)|\psi(t)\rangle = (I - i \delta tH)|\psi(t)\rangle = |\psi(t+\delta t)\rangle \rightarrow i\frac{|\psi(t+\delta t) - |\psi(t)\rangle}{\delta t} = i\frac{\partial |\psi(t)\rangle}{\partial t} = H|\psi(t)\rangle$

see this answer enter link description here


I am now interested in deriving the Dirac equation using the same methodology.

My idea is instead of $U=e^{-itH/\hbar}$, I would start with this:

$$ G=\exp -i \frac{mc}{4\hbar}(t\gamma_0+x\gamma_1+y\gamma_2+z\gamma_3) $$

Now, I apply the same method as the Schrodinger equation (one for each variable):

$$ G(\delta t, x,y ,z) | \psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle=(I-i\frac{mc}{4\hbar}\gamma_0 \delta t)|\psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle =|\psi(t+\delta t,x,y,z)\rangle \\ G(t, \delta x,y ,z) | \psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle=(I-i\frac{mc}{4\hbar}\gamma_1 \delta x)|\psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle = |\psi(t,x+\delta x ,y,z)\rangle\\ G(t, x, \delta y ,z) | \psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle=(I-i\frac{mc}{4\hbar}\gamma_2 \delta y)|\psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle = |\psi(t,x,y+\delta y,z)\rangle\\ G(t, x, y , \delta z) | \psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle=(I-i\frac{mc}{4\hbar}\gamma_3 \delta z)|\psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle = |\psi(t,x, y,z + \delta z)\rangle $$

Each one of them produces a Schrodinger-like equation for its respective component:

$$ \gamma_0 i \frac{\partial |\psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle }{\partial t} = \frac{mc}{4\hbar}|\psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle\\ \gamma_1 i\frac{\partial |\psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle }{\partial x} = \frac{mc}{4\hbar}|\psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle\\ \gamma_2 i\frac{\partial |\psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle }{\partial y} = \frac{mc}{4\hbar}|\psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle\\ \gamma_3 i\frac{\partial |\psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle }{\partial z} = \frac{mc}{4\hbar}|\psi(t,x,y,z)\rangle $$

Finally, I add them together and I get the Dirac equation

$$ i \hbar \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \psi - mc \psi =0 $$


Does any of this works? Can we understand the Dirac equation as a 4 parameter evolution of $G$, which would be an extension of the one-parameter evolution of U for the Schrodinger equation?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Note that this would imply something much stronger than the Dirac equation, namely your four isolated equations independently all holding. On that basis I would be extremely skeptical that this $G$ can be given a similar meaning to $U$. $\endgroup$
    – CR Drost
    Commented Jun 29, 2021 at 16:21

1 Answer 1

-1
$\begingroup$

Usually it is done the other way around: the initary operator is derived from the equation (Schrödinger or Dirac). Obviously, the converse is true - it is sufficient to note that $$ \partial_t U(t)=\frac{-iH}{\hbar}U(t) $$ and that $$ |\psi(t)\rangle = U(t)|\psi(0)\rangle. $$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.