I am struggling to grasp the usage of the coefficient of restitution $e$, to be more specific the conventions around $e$ taking negative values and its implications on oblique collisions.
As I have learnt, the coefficient of restitution $e$ is given by the following formula:
$$e=\frac{\text{Relative velocity of seperation}}{\text{Relative velocity of approach}}=\frac{\vert V_2-V_1 \vert}{\vert U_1-U_2 \vert}$$
However some confusion arises over the different manner of ways this formula is expressed in different textbooks, some use
$$e=\frac{ V_2-V_1 }{ U_1-U_2 }$$
or
$$e=\frac{ V_1-V_2 }{ U_1-U_2 }$$
.etc
However these formulae tend to give negative values of $e$ in some cases, and I am unsure on the proper convention regarding negative values of $e$ as I have been unable to find any mention of a negative value of $e$ across multiple textbooks.
Furthermore another dilemma arises for me regarding using the coefficient of restitution for oblique collisions, say we have the following scenario where;
- The initial velocity of the ball is $u$
- The velocity immediately after collision is $v$
- The coefficient of restitution between the ball and wall is $e$
- At the instance of impact the ball makes an angle $\theta$ with the wall
Taking the upwards and right directions as positive and applying the formula for $e$ along the x direction I get
$$e=\frac{v_x}{u_x} \implies v_x=eu_x$$
However from the diagram it is apparent that the x component of the velocity immediately after collision will be towards the left direction, or in other words negative; The problem arises here, if $e$ can not take negative values, and we know that $u_x$ is positive, then how can $v_x$ be negative?