0
$\begingroup$

This is from Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, Exercise 9.13. We have established

$$\mathcal{K}_{3}=\begin{bmatrix}0 & 1 & 0\\ -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix},$$

and

$$\mathcal{R}_{z}\left(\zeta\right)=\exp\left(\mathcal{K}_{3}\zeta\right)=\begin{bmatrix}\cos\zeta & \sin\zeta & 0\\ -\sin\zeta & \cos\zeta & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.$$

Part (e) of the exercise

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be the curve $\mathcal{P}=\mathcal{R}_{z}\left(t\right)$ through the identity matrix, $\mathcal{C}\left(0\right)=\mathcal{I}\in\mathcal{SO}\left(3\right).$ Show that its tangent, $\left(d\mathcal{C}/dt\right)\left(0\right)=\dot{\mathcal{C}}\left(0\right)$ does not vanish by computing $\dot{\mathcal{C}}\left(0\right)f_{12},$ where $f_{12}$ is the function $f_{12}\left(\mathcal{P}\right)=P_{12},$ whose value is the $12$ matrix element of $\mathcal{P}.$

Every way I can think of to differentiate $\mathcal{R}_{z}\left(\zeta\right)$ leads to the third row and third column being zero.

$$\mathcal{R}_{z}\left(\zeta\right)\equiv\exp\left(\mathcal{K}_{3}\zeta\right)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\theta^{n}}{n!}\left(\mathcal{K}_{3}\right)^{n}=e^{\mathcal{K}_{3}\zeta}$$

$$\mathcal{R}_{z}^{\prime}\left(\zeta\right)=\mathcal{K}_{3}e^{\mathcal{K}_{3}\zeta}=\begin{bmatrix}-\sin\zeta & \cos\zeta & 0\\ -\cos\zeta & -\sin\zeta & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$$

Is this correct? The exercise doesn't to address the value of $P_{33}.$

I'm not asking if I have the right answer to the question. I'm asking if a matrix which is not an element of $\mathcal{SO}\left(3\right)$ can serve as a tangent to a curve on $\mathcal{SO}\left(3\right).$ That is different from the case of tangent vectors to manifolds (surfaces) in $\mathbb{R}^n$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A tangent vector at a point in $\mathbb{R}^3$ is an element of the tangent space at that point. That tangent space is isomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^3.$ So both the radial position vector of the point of application, and the tangent vector have representations as elements of $\mathbb{R}^3,$ and are thus the same kind of object. If a tangent to a curve in SO(3) is a singular matrix, it is not an element of SO(3). I just want to be sure that is a correct understanding. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 26, 2021 at 2:37

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The answer to your question is yes. In Lie group theory language, what you are doing is constructing the Lie algebra of a Lie group. So the tangent vector you have created is an element of the Lie algebra $\mathcal{so(3)}$ not an element of the group $\mathcal{SO(3)}$.

In general a manifold does not have a vector space structure, but the tangent space at any point is always a vector space (so like $\mathbb{R}^n$). In that sense $\mathbb{R}^n$ is a special case because the manifold is already a vector space. The group $\mathcal{SO(3)}$ is not a vector space.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.