2
$\begingroup$

If a diatomic gas like Hydrogen has 6 maximum degrees of freedom why its molar heat capacity reaches at high temperatures $C_V = \frac{7}{2} R$ and not $C_V = \frac{6}{2} R= 3R$?

molar heat capacity of hydrogen

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The degrees of freedom of a diatomic gas are as follows:

  • 3 translational: The molecule can move in x, y and z-direction.
  • 2 rotational: The molecule can in principle rotate around each axis. But consider rotations around the molecular axis (connecting the H atoms): in this case, the physics doesn't change. Another way of thinking about it is that the axial rotation mode only can store a vanishing amount of energy, compared to the others.

    The rotational modes are only available at higher temeratures, since the molecule has a moment of inertia that has to be overcome to start rotating.

  • 2 vibrational: The atoms can wiggle together and apart, which is one degree of freedom. But there is also another one, which is harder to see: Think of the molecule as an harmonic oszillator with kinetic and potential energy.

    If both atoms are displaced towards the middle, the molecule has a higher potential energy. The equations of the harmonic oscillator would normally fix the kinetic energy of the atoms in this case. But in a gas with its random kinematics it is totally possible that they have the "wrong" kinetic energies for their relative displacement. So, for the purposes of statistical mechanics, these are 2 further DOFs, making seven.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ A lot of words for a simple fact: Vibration is two degrees, textbooks explain that with kinetic and potential energy. I found that rather strange as a student too, but textbooks are textbooks. I think mistnim is asking on the same problem. Your explanation isn't a explanation to me. $\endgroup$
    – Georg
    Commented Apr 23, 2013 at 14:26
  • $\begingroup$ @Georg: I found it in need of an explanation that the 7th degree of freedom is really a separate DOF. Some simple arguments suggest otherwise: Say #6 is the wiggling, or $\dot p$ of the HO, and #7 is the motion of the center of mass, or $\dot x$. Then a) one variable is determined by the other through the HO DGL, thus they are not independent and b) isn't the movement of the center just a translation? $\endgroup$
    – jdm
    Commented Apr 23, 2013 at 14:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.