2
$\begingroup$

Assuming a QFT description of a second-order phase transition. From the free theory, one obtains some critical exponents and one performs an $\epsilon$-expansion below the upper critical dimension. There are some cases, where one finds that $\Sigma=G_0^{-1}-G^{-1}$ the self-energy is zero in all orders in the perturbation.

  • Does this imply that the fixed point remains a Gaussian fixed point?

  • If so why is this the case?

  • If not what has to be fulfilled that the fixed point remains Gaussian?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

There are cases where the self-energy is zero to all orders in perturbation theory, in any dimension $d$, and the fixed point might be Gaussian or not.

Usually, they correspond to theories where there are causality or particle conservation constraints. I will just give one example.

Take non-relativistic interacting bosons at zero chemical potential and zero temperature. Since the system is empty, the exact 2-point function is that of a free particle $$G(\omega,p)=(i\omega+\frac{p^2}{2m})^{-1},$$ which means that the self-energy vanishes exactly, even if the Hamiltonian is quartic.

The reason is that all possible self-energy diagrams need to have a closed-loop, that exactly vanishes due to causality (this is related to the fact that the inverse propagator is linear in frequency). It is more obvious physically: the system is empty, and thus a single particle propagates freely.

On the other hand, the 4-point function, corresponding to the scattering of two particles, is renormalized. For the coupling constant $g$, the exact RG equation reads $$ \partial_s g = \epsilon g + C g^2,$$ with $\epsilon = d-2$ and $C$ some constant. One sees that for $d<2$, there is a non-trivial fixed point, whereas the interaction is irrelevant for $d\geq2$. In $d=2$, the interaction vanishes logarithmically. (Of course, in $d=3$, the dimensionful, renormalized, interaction is finite, and related to the s-wave scattering length. We are here talking about the coupling constant in units of the RG scale, which does vanish.)

One can show that indeed, this physics does correspond to a critical point, with scale invariance, but mean-field critical exponent (even for the non-Gaussian fixed point). Is this a critical point between two phases? Yes! It is a quantum critical point between the vacuum (for negative chemical potential) and a superfluid phase.

All this is discussed in S. Sachdev's book "Quantum Phase Transition".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.