3
$\begingroup$

There are some points in this wikipedia chapter. Main equation is:

$$ T^{\alpha \beta} \, = \left(\rho + {p \over c^2}\right)u^{\alpha}u^{\beta} + p g^{\alpha \beta} $$

where $c$ is explicit.

The one for the trace is:

$$T = 3p - \rho c^2$$

that seems contradictory with:

$$T^{\alpha\beta} = \left( \begin{matrix} \rho & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & p & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & p & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & p \end{matrix} \right)$$

with trace $3p+\rho$ (difference in sign and value of last term).

The expression for the four-velocity:

$$u^{\alpha} = (1, 0, 0, 0)$$

is not the usual one $(c, 0, 0, 0)$.

Finally, the metric:

$$g^{\alpha\beta} \, = \left( \begin{matrix} - c^{-2} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{matrix} \right)$$

also with explicit $c$, it is also not the usual:

$$\left( \begin{matrix} -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{matrix} \right)$$

Are the wikipedia equations in this chapter using a coherent notation ? If yes, how to explain the previous points ?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thinking of tensors as "matrices" always ended up confusing me. In fact, I believe you can't strictly take a trace of an object like $T^{\mu\nu}$, since this quantity will turn out to be basis dependent. I find it better to think of the "trace" for such objects to be $g_{\mu\nu} T^{\mu\nu}$. See this answer here. $\endgroup$
    – Philip
    Commented Aug 21, 2020 at 21:32

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

The trace is ${T^\mu}_\mu$ not $T^{\mu\mu}$, so the minus sign from lowering lowering the $\mu=0$ index accounts for the sign difference. Also $c=1$ for most people, so the he wiki may not be consistent, but getting right is easy.

Looking at the Wiki, it is $g^{\mu\nu}$nthat has the $c^{-2}$, and to lower the index you need $g_{\mu\nu}$ which has the $-c^2$, so the wiki article is consistent.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I looked the wiki article it appears consistten, You did not say that your metric matrix ``$g$'' was actually the inverse metric. I amended my answer. $\endgroup$
    – mike stone
    Commented Aug 21, 2020 at 21:46
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, question edited. However, still surprised by $u^{\alpha}=(1,0,0,0)$ instead of $u^{\alpha}=(c,0,0,0)$ $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 21, 2020 at 21:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.