0
$\begingroup$

I am currently studying the textbook Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light, 7th edition, by Max Born and Emil Wolf. Page 5, chapter 1.1.3 Boundary conditions at a surface of discontinuity, says the following as a note at the bottom of the page:

$^*$ For later purposes we note a representation of the surface charge density and the surface current density in terms of the Dirac delta function (see Appendix IV). If the equation of the surface of discontinuity is $F(x, y, z) = 0$, then $$\rho = \hat{\rho} \mid \text{grad} \ F \mid \delta(F) \tag{17a}$$ $$\mathbf{j} = \hat{\mathbf{j}} \mid \text{grad} \ F \mid \delta(F) \tag{18a}$$ These relations can immediately be verified by substituting from (17a) and (18a) into (17) and (18) and using the relation $dF = |\text{grad} \ F| dh$ and the shifting property of the delta function.

Can someone please explain to me what this notation with $|\text{grad} \ F|$ means? I have never encountered it before.

Thank you.

$\endgroup$
8
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $grad F$ is a vector (the gradient of F) and |grad F| is the magnitude of that vector. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14, 2020 at 10:12
  • $\begingroup$ @planetmaker Oh, so 17a just means $\hat{\rho}$ times the magnitude of $\text{grad} \ F$ times $\delta(F)$? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14, 2020 at 10:15
  • $\begingroup$ To add to @planetmaker's comment, an alternative notation would be $|\vec{\nabla} F|$ $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14, 2020 at 10:17
  • $\begingroup$ @BySymmetry Ok, thanks. The form that (17a) and (18a) are written in almost makes it look like some new notation, rather than the magnitude. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14, 2020 at 10:18
  • $\begingroup$ It looks totally normal and is very common notation.Only nit-pick is that I'd expect the magnitude bars closer to it's vector and not evenly spaced between the constituents of the equation. $\rho = \hat{\rho} |grad{F}| \delta(F)$ $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14, 2020 at 10:42

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

It's the magnitude of the gradient of $F$.

$\operatorname{grad} F$ or $\nabla F$ denotes the gradient of the field F and thus $|\operatorname{grad} F|$ is the magnitude of the gradient of F.

It's common practise, but just a matter of taste, to use $\operatorname{grad} F$ over $\nabla F$ in order to guide the eye easier as to what is being done or used (similar to $\operatorname{curl} A = \nabla \times A$).

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ B & W Is a wonderful book that was written before the notation of using $\nabla$ for 'grad' was adopted. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14, 2020 at 12:41
  • $\begingroup$ Let me know when you get to $rot$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14, 2020 at 15:03
  • $\begingroup$ @JerroldFranklin rot and curl is the same... $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14, 2020 at 16:23
0
$\begingroup$

If F is any scalar function ,then Grad F will be the vector one as gradient operator is a vectorial operator. In the said equation,you have a vector quantity in the left hand side.It means your right hand side must represent a vector quantity.A unit vector is there in the right hand side,so all other parts should be scalar.That's why magnitude of Grad F is taken there.It just represent a number(scalar).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.