0
$\begingroup$

In a question, the left plate of a capacitor carried a charge Q while the switch was off;

enter image description here

When the switch is closed and the current stops flowing again, you're supposed to find the final charge on the right plate.

It's apparently done this way(say the electric field $= E$ ) ;

$$E = E_1 + E_2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ $$

$$E = \frac{Q+x}{2A\epsilon_0}+\frac{x}{2A\epsilon_0} $$

Here, $V$ 's the potential, $A$ 's the surface area of the plates, and $d$ 's the distance between capacitor plates;

$$ V = Ed \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ $$

$$ V = \frac{(Q+2x)d}{2A\epsilon_0}$$ Now,$$ C = \frac{\epsilon_0A}{D} $$ Now solving this;

$$x = CE - \frac{Q}{2}$$

But the final potential across the capacitor is always equal to the cell potential $\epsilon$, so why can't it be done this way?

$$\frac{Q + x}{C} - \frac{-x}{C} = E \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ $$

$$Q+x+x = CE$$

$$ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ -x \ =\frac{Q-CE}{2}$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I think the charge on right most plate should be $\frac{Q}{2} - CE$, you forgot that it would have $-x$ charge $\endgroup$
    – maverick
    Commented Jun 24, 2020 at 7:57
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, I'll add the thing about the negative, but how is it Q/2 - CE and not (Q-CE)/2? $\endgroup$
    – harry
    Commented Jun 24, 2020 at 9:59

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I don't think you can write the potential of a single plate as $\frac{\text{charge}}{\text{capacitance}}$ because how would you define the capacitance of a single plate?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.