5
$\begingroup$

I have just gone through the exercise of constructing the supersymmetrized QED action.

In the end, I get a reasonable action which matches literature. But after a little analysis, I find that the supersymmetrized gauge interactions (electron-selectron-photino vertices) seem to violate CP. In the two-component Weyl notation, this is:

$$\mathcal{L}_\text{int}=\ldots+\sqrt{2}e(\phi_Le_L^\dagger\lambda^\dagger+\phi_L^*e_L\lambda)-\sqrt{2}e(\phi_R e_R^\dagger\lambda^\dagger+\phi_R^*e_R\lambda)$$

Where $\lambda$ is the gaugino, $\Phi_L=(\phi_L,e_L)$ is a left chiral superfield with charge $-1$, and $\Phi_R=(\phi_R,e_R)$ is the Dirac-partner chiral superfield with charge $+1$.

I am assuming, that under $CP$, the two chiral superfields transform into one another:

$$CP:\qquad\Phi_L\leftrightarrow\Phi_R$$

Question: Is my analysis correct? Is is really true that supersymmetric QED violates CP?

Edit: I just realized that in my construction I assumed that $m$ in the superpotential ($m\phi_R\phi_L$) is real. It seems to me that more generally, it is allowed to be complex...

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I am in error. The supersymmetric gauge interactions displayed in my original post does not violate CP. The error is in the transformation rule I gave above. Under CP, the chiral superfields should transform:

$$CP:\qquad \Phi_L\rightarrow\Phi_L^*,\enspace \Phi_R\rightarrow\Phi_R^*$$

Therefore these interactions only violate P. This is something that I can come to grips with (rather than CP violation). It would be nice to get a double check on my claim.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.