0
$\begingroup$

In the phase space formulation, the terms "representation", "function, and "quasi-probability distribution" (as in Glauber–Sudarshan P representation, $P$-function) seem to be used interchangeably. I wonder about the semantics of these terms: Do they all really mean exactly the same thing, even mathematically, or might there be some subtleties to be understood?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

These three things all emphasize different properties:

  • "Function": reminds you you're dealing with a function on phase space. Also the shortest one, so can be used for convenience.
  • "Representation": reminds you this function represents the content of a particular quantum state.
  • "Quasi-probability distribution": reminds you this function is like a probability distribution but isn't really one.

These adjectives end up being used interchangably not because they mean the same thing, but because the three most common things they're applied to ($P$-function, $Q$-function, Wigner function) have all three of these properties.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ A small tweak: in that article, "representation" is mostly used to contradistinguish functions derived by different operator-ordering maps. They are equivalent, but different rules for producing different functions (P, Q, and W, and... and...) corresponding to ("representing") the same operators and physical quantities. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 22, 2020 at 1:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.