Quantum phase space

Classical phase space is defined as a space in which all possible states are represented. Every state corresponds to a unique point in the phase space.

On the other hand, in quantum mechanics every quantum mechanical observable corresponds to a unique function (distribution) on phase space.

In quantum mechanics we usually deal with Wigner function in $(x,p)$ space, but there also exist Glauber-Sudarshan $P$ or Husimi $Q$ distribution in parameter space of coherent states. This concept was firstly applied to Hamiltonians with Heisenberg-Weyl dynamical group, but other hamiltonians with different dynamical group (e.g. $SU(2)$) have formulation in phase space - parametric space of generalized coherent space (Perelomov).

In former case, both phase space $(x,p)$ and coherent state is flat - it is just a plane. In the concept of generalized coherent states for e.g. $SU(2)$ group, parameter space can be identified with sphere.

1. What is the topology of the associated phase space with Wigner function?

2. Can we only determine topology of the phase space, or the geometry is also possible?

3. Are all those formulations with Wigner, Glauber, Husimi etc. equivalent?

• What do you mean with geometry? As a phase space, it's a symplectic manifold, what more is there to know about its "geometry"? – ACuriousMind Jan 11 '15 at 23:03
• Also, your introductory statements are strange. Classically, observables are also functions on the phase space (they are the Poisson algebra of smooth functions). It's the states that become represented differently (e.g. by sections of complex line bundles, but you seem more interested in the quasi-probability distributions), and hence the action of the observables on them. This question might really be a good one, but it needs clarification of what exactly you want to know. (3. is also unrelated to 1. and 2., I'd advise editing it out and asking it separately) – ACuriousMind Sep 10 '15 at 15:36

The geometry and topology of the relevant phase space is identical for both classical and quantum problems: it is the very same phase space. The scale of the former is the small $\hbar$ limit of the latter.

Extended WFs appear like δ-fctn spikes ("points") in the small $\hbar$ limit, once the phase space-variables are suitably rescaled by $\sqrt{\hbar}$. That's what you probably mean by classical states. You might monitor the "morphing" of static oscillator WFs as $\hbar$ decreases, in Ref. 1.

All these representations (Wigner, Glauber, Husimi, Mehta...) are equivalent, that is, there are standard invertible maps from each to each other, cf. Ref. 1.

References:

1. Thomas L. Curtright, David B. Fairlie, & Cosmas K. Zachos, A Concise Treatise on Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space, World Scientific, 2014. The PDF file is available here.
• Dear Cosmas Zachos: Welcome to Phys.SE. For your information, Phys.SE has a policy that it is OK to cite oneself, but it should be stated clearly and explicitly in the answer itself, not in attached links. – Qmechanic Sep 10 '15 at 19:30
• Also if the pdf file is published, please include its reference, so that it is possible to restore the post in case of future link rot. – Qmechanic Sep 10 '15 at 19:38
• Thanks. The ISBN-13 is 978-9814520430 . I feared that sticking in the Amazon coordinates might come across as commercial activity. I fear I have used my text to put my finger on formulas and arguments, which I can hardly locate in other books on the subject. But I have done it so many times, by now, that I hardly know where to begin – Cosmas Zachos Sep 10 '15 at 19:45
• Right, ISBN number is probably a bit too much. I edited your answer to conform with Phys.SE self-citation policy. Feel free to edit further if needed. – Qmechanic Sep 10 '15 at 20:11