1
$\begingroup$

I'm currently studying Kittel's Solid State Physics and in his chapter on Phonon heat capacity, we need to first calculate the total energy $U$. Phonons have energy $E_n = (n+1/2)\hbar\omega$ and he first calculated the average energy $\langle E\rangle$ and using the Boltzmann factor, he showed: $$\langle E\rangle = \dfrac{1}{2}\hbar\omega+\hbar\omega\dfrac{1}{e^{\hbar\omega/k_BT}-1}=\dfrac{1}{2}\hbar\omega+\hbar\omega\langle n \rangle$$ so then we must have $$\langle n \rangle=\dfrac{1}{e^{\hbar\omega/k_BT}-1}$$ I recognise this as the Bose-Einstein but I'm surprised to see this as being interpreted as an average of the number of states. I always thought this was a probabilistic distribution and in fact, Kittel does seem to use this as a probability since he later writes: $$U=\int d\omega\ \hbar\omega D(\omega)\langle n \rangle$$ where $D(\omega)$ is the density of state. In this expression $D$ already accounts for the number of photons so $\langle n \rangle$ must be some probability weight? I'm sure something is flawed in my understanding so any help is appreciated!

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ <n> isn't an average number of states. It's the average number of phonons in a state with frequency $\omega$ at temperature T. $\endgroup$
    – user93237
    Commented Nov 1, 2018 at 5:27
  • $\begingroup$ Another reason why $<n>$ is not a probability distribution is because the integral of it diverges. So it can't be a physical probability distribution. $\endgroup$
    – emir sezik
    Commented Dec 21, 2022 at 14:14

3 Answers 3

2
$\begingroup$

Distribution does not automatically means a probabilistic distribution - rather, in case of of Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics we speak about distributions over energy/frequency. E.g., one can easily see that they are not normalizes, if integrated by energy.

Fermi-Dirac distribution can be interpreted as a probability that the state of given energy is occupied or empty, but this interpretation is problematic with Bose-Einstein distribution, which may take values greater than 1.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I wouldn't say that $D\left(\omega\right)$ accounts for the number of phonons; I'd say it accounts for the number of vibrational (phonon) modes at a given energy. A phonon is a unit of energy in a vibrational mode. Then, $\left<n\right>$ is the average number of phonons in a given vibrational mode (what Samuel Weir said).

So the integrand is the energy of a phonon $\hbar \omega$ times the average number of those phonons in a mode $\left<n\right>$ times the density of modes at that energy $D\left(\omega\right)$.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

For a given oscillation frequency $\omega$, the average energy of this oscillation mode is: $$ E_\omega = \frac{1}{Z} \sum_{n=0}^\infty \left\{ \left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)\hbar \omega \, e^{-\beta \left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right) \hbar \omega} \right\} \tag{1} $$ where $Z$ is the probability normalization (also known as the partition function) $$ Z = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \left\{ e^{-\beta \left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right) \hbar \omega} \right\} = e^{-\beta\frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega}\sum_{n=0}^\infty \left\{ e^{-\beta n \hbar \omega} \right\}=e^{-\beta\frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega} \frac{1}{1-e^{-\beta\hbar \omega}}=\frac{1}{e^{\beta\hbar \omega/2}-e^{-\beta\hbar \omega/2}} \tag{2} $$

Using Eq.(2) to express Eq.(1) as \begin{align*} E_\omega &= -\frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \sum_{n=0}^\infty \left\{ e^{-\beta \left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right) \hbar \omega} \right\} = -\frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial \beta} = -\frac{\partial \ln Z}{\partial \beta}\\ &= -\frac{\partial }{\partial \beta} \left\{ -\ln \left(e^{\beta\hbar \omega/2}-e^{-\beta\hbar \omega/2} \right)\right\} \\ &=\frac{e^{\beta\hbar \omega/2}+e^{-\beta\hbar \omega/2}}{e^{\beta\hbar \omega/2}-e^{-\beta\hbar \omega/2}}\frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega = \coth\left( \frac{\beta \hbar \omega}{2} \right)\frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega \end{align*} Therefore, for a fixed $\omega$, the average oscillation mode of phonon $\langle n \rangle$: $$ \langle n \rangle = \frac{E_\omega}{\hbar\omega} = \frac{1}{2} \coth\left( \frac{\beta \hbar \omega}{2} \right). $$

Then we consider all different oscillation frequencies $$ U = \int_0^{\omega_D} E_\omega D(\omega) d\omega \tag{3} $$ where $D(\omega)$ is the density of state as the number of oscillation modes between $\omega$ and $\omega + d\omega$.

Seemingly, that the Debye's model will be adopted, known as the acoustic mode.$^1$ It assumes a linear dispersion $$ \omega = v_s k. $$ where $v_s$ is the sound speed.

Therefore, the 1-d density if state $$ D(\omega) = \frac{L}{2\pi}\frac{dk}{d\omega}= \frac{L}{2\pi v_s} $$ $L$ is the length of the system.

In Eq. (3), there is one more parameter, $\omega_D$, the Debye frequency, defined as the upper limit of the cut-off frequency for rendering the total number of mode being equals to the total number of oscillator (atoms or number of cells). $$ N = \int_0^{\omega_D} D(\omega) d\omega = \int_0^{\omega_D} \frac{L}{2\pi v_s} d\omega = \frac{L}{2\pi v_s} \omega_D. $$

Therefore $$ \omega_D = 2\pi v_s \frac{N}{L}. $$

*1. The other well known model is the Einstein model, which is easier $$ D(\omega) = \delta(\omega - \omega_o). $$ also know as the optical mode of phonon.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.