0
$\begingroup$

Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation is usually motivated by an energy balance : at thermal equilibrium, the absorbed power should be exactly compensated by the radiated power, hence $$ \alpha(\Omega,\nu)\mathcal{K}(\Omega,\nu)=\mathcal{L}(\Omega,\nu)=\epsilon(\Omega,\nu) \mathcal{L}_{BB}(\Omega,\nu) $$

where $\alpha$ is the absorptivity (fraction of incident power absorbed by the body), $\mathcal{K}$ is the incident spectral radiance (incoming power per surface unit, steradian and Herz), $\mathcal{L}$ is the body spectral radiance (radiated power per surface unit, steradian and Herz) $\epsilon$ is the emissivity of the body (ratio between the body radiance and that of a black body).

If the body is illuminated by a thermal radiation, $\mathcal{K}=\mathcal{L}_{BB}$ and we conclude $$ \alpha(\Omega,\nu)=\epsilon(\Omega,\nu) $$

My question is the following : why is this relation true for all frequency and solid angles ? Why would energy conservation apply in each mode, and not only globally ? Why don't we rather consider an integrated form such as $$ \int d\nu d\Omega \, \alpha(\Omega,\nu) \mathcal{L}_{BB}(\Omega,\nu)= \int d\nu d\Omega \, \epsilon(\Omega,\nu) \mathcal{L}_{BB}(\Omega,\nu) $$

Complementary question : can Kirchhoff law be related to transition amplitude in a quantum description ?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I came up with a solution from the university of Arizona.

Let's consider a body with emissivity $\epsilon_{1}(\lambda)$ and absorptivity $\alpha_{1}(\lambda)$.

The energy balance for the body exposed to a thermal radiation of radiance $\mathcal{L}_{T}(\lambda)$ imposes $$ \int d\lambda\,\mathcal{L}_{T}(\lambda)\epsilon_{1}(\lambda)=\int d\lambda\,\mathcal{L}_{T}(\lambda)\alpha_{1}(\lambda) $$ which is not enough to conclude on the identity between emissivity and absorptivity at all wavelength.

Let's now put the body inside a cavity, the radiative behavior of which is characterized by $\epsilon_{2},\,\alpha_{2}$. We assume thermal equilibrium at temperature T between the body and the cavity.

The spectral irradiance arriving on the body is $$\phi_{in}(\lambda)=\mathcal{L}_{T}(\lambda)\epsilon_{2}(\lambda)+\left(1-\alpha_{2}(\lambda)\right)\phi_{out}(\lambda)$$ where the spectral irradiance reaching the cavity is expressed as $$\phi_{out}(\lambda)=\mathcal{L}_{T}(\lambda)\epsilon_{1}(\lambda)+\left(1-\alpha_{1}(\lambda)\right)\phi_{in}(\lambda).$$

Solving this simple system leads to $$ \phi_{in}(\lambda) =\mathcal{L}_{T}\frac{\epsilon_{2}+\epsilon_{1}(1-\alpha_{2})}{1-(1-\alpha_{1})(1-\alpha_{2})}\\ \phi_{out}(\lambda) =\mathcal{L}_{T}\frac{\epsilon_{1}+\epsilon_{2}(1-\alpha_{1})}{1-(1-\alpha_{1})(1-\alpha_{2})} $$ and the energy balance requires $$ \int d\lambda\,\phi_{in}(\lambda)=\int d\lambda\,\phi_{out}(\lambda)\\ \Rightarrow\int d\lambda\,\mathcal{L}_{T}\frac{\alpha_{1}\alpha_{2}}{1-(1-\alpha_{1})(1-\alpha_{2})}\left(\frac{\epsilon_{2}}{\alpha_{2}}-\frac{\epsilon_{1}}{\alpha_{1}}\right)=0 $$ The trick is that this relation holds for whatever cavity material, ie whatever $\epsilon_{2},\,\alpha_{2}$. This is possible if and only if $\epsilon\propto\alpha$, and the first equation imposes $\epsilon(\lambda)=\alpha(\lambda)$ for each wavelength, hence the Kirchhoff law of radiation.

This proof is written in spectral domain, but can be extended to the angular domain as well.


I read that Kirchhoff law was only holding in time-reversal symmetric systems. Where is this assumption used here ?

$\endgroup$
2

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.