3
$\begingroup$

Gluons can be red-antiblue, or green-antired, etc.

What about weak interaction bosons? (Say before symmetry breaking, to make matters simpler.)

Is there a similar "weak charge" structure of charge-anticharge?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

My answer to my own question here may be helpful.

No, there is no anti-isospin as there is no anti-spin, because $SU(2)$ has no complex representations. In contrast, $SU(3)$ has complex representations and therefore the conjugate charge is different from normal charge, which means in the case of $SU(3)$ color

A complex representation $R$, is a group representation where you can't find a matrix $U$ such that $\bar R = U R U^\dagger$. In words this means that $\bar R$ is really different from $R$ and not related to it by a similarity transformation.

For color and isospin this means the following. We describe our fields by spinors, scalar or vectors, which is a way of saying how the various fields transform under Poincare transformations. For simplicity assume we deal with a scalar field, which is a field that does not change under Poincare transformations.

Nevertheless, this scalar field can have non-trivial transformation properties under the gauge group of the standard model. The complete group we are usually dealing with in the standard model is

$$ SU(3) \times SU(2) \times U(1) \times \text{ Poincare Group } $$

For example, fields that carry color (color charge) transform under a non-trivial representation (not the 1-dimensional) representation of $SU(3)$. Gluons according to the 8-dim adjoint, quarks according to the fundamental 3-dim rep. Equivalently, fields with isospin are described by objects that transform non-trivial under $SU(2)$ transformations.

Lets assume our scalar field transforms according to the 3-dim rep of $SU(3)$ (=carries color charge) and according to the 2-dim rep of $SU(2)$ (=carries isospin) and carries zero electrical charge.

We get the mathematical object that describes the corresponding antiparticle by hermitian conjugation. (This is more difficult for spinors.)

$$ \Phi \rightarrow \Phi^\star $$

or in terms of group representations (for the complete group I quotes above)

$$ 3 \times 2 \times 0 \times 1 \rightarrow \bar 3 \times \bar 2 \times 0 \times \bar 1 $$

where I label each representation by its dimension. Now, because it's a mathematical fact that $SU(2)$ has no complex reps and $\bar 1=1$, we know that the antiparticle transforms according to

$$ 3 \times 2 \times 0 \times 1 \rightarrow \bar 3 \times 2 \times 0 \times 1 $$

What we learn here is that the antiparticle carries different KIND OF $SU(3)$ charge= anti-color. The isospin may change sign but it still transform according to the same representation and therefore is of the same kind.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Could you explain this in more detail? Why exactly is the colour-anticolour due to the complexity of the representation? Could you also tell what distinguishes a complex representation from the Pauli matrices - which are are also complex? $\endgroup$
    – Hans973
    Commented Jul 13, 2015 at 3:58
  • $\begingroup$ @Hans973 I added some thoughts that may help $\endgroup$
    – jak
    Commented Jul 14, 2015 at 7:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.