3
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to figure out Lorentz group in 2+1. First of all, I'd like to think the special orthgonal group as a combination of rotation and boost in space. Then I construct it as below. First rotation part: $$ R(\theta)= \begin{pmatrix} cos\theta& -sin\theta & 0 \\ sin\theta & cos\theta & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} $$ I assume $\theta$ is infinitesimally small and $\theta \sim \epsilon$ then $cos\theta \sim 1$ and $sin\theta \sim \theta$ $$ R(\theta)=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0& 1&0 \\ 0&0&1\end{pmatrix} -\epsilon \begin{pmatrix} 0&1&0 \\ -1&0&0\\ 0&0&0\end{pmatrix} $$ I have just one parameter $\theta$ so I suppose I have one generator as well from rotations. And it is $$ J=\begin{pmatrix} 0&i&0 \\ -i&0&0\\ 0&0&0\end{pmatrix} $$ and I construct the boost part as $$ T(\phi)=\begin{pmatrix} cosh\phi&0&sinh\phi\\0&1&0\\sinh\phi&0&cosh\phi\end{pmatrix} $$ $$ T(\theta)= \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0& 1&0 \\ 0&0&1\end{pmatrix} - \epsilon\begin{pmatrix}0&0&1\\0&0&0\\ 1&0&0\end{pmatrix} $$ and the generator comes from translation is $$ K=\begin{pmatrix}0&0&i\\0&0&0\\ i&0&0\end{pmatrix} $$ Apologies for poor notation and terminology. But I think I need to have $\frac{n(n-1)}{2}$ generator right? If yes I have one more but how can I get it? And how can I construct Lie Algebra then?
NOTE:I also posted this question on Math.SE but I'm afraid here is more proper. I am not looking for a way of any other isomorphic groups to construct this LG. I have not much knowledge about homomorphism, isomorphism etc.. Thanks.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/28535/2451 $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented May 10, 2015 at 12:34
  • $\begingroup$ I assume that when you say translation you really mean boost? $\endgroup$
    – Prahar
    Commented May 10, 2015 at 12:36
  • $\begingroup$ @Prahar yes, right. $\endgroup$
    – aQuestion
    Commented May 10, 2015 at 12:37

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

$SO(1,\,2)$, with two spatial dimensions, only has rotations in one plane - that of all space. So if our co-ordinates are $(t,\,x,\,y)$ (spatial co-ords last), its unique (up to a real scale factor of course) rotational Lie algebra generator must be:

$$R=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}0&0&0\\0&0&-1\\0&1&0\end{array}\right)$$

where we've put the unit $I=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0&-1\\1&0\end{array}\right)$ which exponentiates to the 2D rotation $e^{I\,\theta}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}\cos\theta&-\sin\theta\\\sin\theta&\cos\theta\end{array}\right)$ in the lower right corner.

Likewise, we put the generator $K=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0&+1\\+1&0\end{array}\right)$ of 1D boosts in the $x$ direction, which exponentiates to $e^{\eta\,K}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}\cosh\eta&\sinh\eta\\\sinh\eta&\cosh\eta\end{array}\right)$ in the upper right corner to get the generator of boosts in the $x$ direction:

$$B_x=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}0&1&0\\1&0&0\\0&0&0\end{array}\right)$$

Do the same for boosts in the $y$ direction in the first / third rows/columns which correspond to the time and y co-ordinates:

$$B_y=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}0&0&1\\0&0&0\\1&0&0\end{array}\right)$$

and then readily show that the linear space $\mathfrak{l}=\langle\{B_x,\,B_y,\,R\}\rangle$ spanned by $\{B_x,\,B_y,\,R\}$ is closed under the Lie bracket, with bracket relationships:

$$[B_x,\,B_y]=-R;\quad[B_x,\,R]=-Ly;\quad[B_y,\,R]=+Lx$$

Therefore, under the Lie correspondence, $\mathfrak{L}=\bigcup\limits_{k=1}^\infty\,\exp(\mathfrak{l})^k$ is the identity connected component $SO^+(1,\,2)$ of $SO(1,\,2)$: the Lie group of all boosts and rotations in the $X\wedge Y$ plane.

The generator of boosts in a direction at angle $\theta$ relative to the $x$ axis is:

$$B_\theta = \mathrm{Ad}(e^{I\,\theta})\,B_x = e^{I\,\theta}\,B_x\,e^{-I\,\theta} = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}0&\cos\theta&\sin\theta\\\cos\theta&0&0\\\sin\theta&0&0\end{array}\right)$$

exponentiating to the general boost $\beta(\theta\,\eta) = \exp(\eta\,B_\theta)$, which works out to:

$$\beta(\theta,\,\eta)=\left( \begin{array}{ccc} \cosh (\eta ) & \cos (\theta ) \sinh (\eta ) & \sin (\theta ) \sinh (\eta ) \\ \cos (\theta ) \sinh (\eta ) & \cosh (\eta ) \cos ^2(\theta )+\sin ^2(\theta ) & \cos (\theta ) (\cosh (\eta )-1) \sin (\theta ) \\ \sin (\theta ) \sinh (\eta ) & \cos (\theta ) (\cosh (\eta )-1) \sin (\theta ) & \cos ^2(\theta )+\cosh (\eta ) \sin ^2(\theta ) \\ \end{array} \right)$$

Alternatively, you can write a general boost as $\exp(\eta_x\,B_x+\eta_y\,B_y)$ with the result:

$$\exp(\eta_x\,B_x+\eta_y\,B_y)=\left( \begin{array}{ccc} \cosh \left(\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}\right) & \frac{\eta_x \sinh \left(\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}\right)}{\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}} & \frac{\eta_y \sinh \left(\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}\right)}{\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}} \\ \frac{\eta_x \sinh \left(\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}\right)}{\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}} & \frac{\cosh \left(\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}\right) \eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2} & \frac{\eta_x \eta_y \left(\cosh \left(\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}\right)-1\right)}{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2} \\ \frac{\eta_y \sinh \left(\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}\right)}{\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}} & \frac{\eta_x \eta_y \left(\cosh \left(\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}\right)-1\right)}{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2} & \frac{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2 \cosh \left(\sqrt{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2}\right)}{\eta_x^2+\eta_y^2} \\ \end{array} \right)$$

Unlike the $SO(1,\,3)$, which has two connected components, there are no unity determinant matrices which conserve the pseudonorm $t^2 - x^2 -y^2$ which are outside $SO^+(1,\,2)$. So in fact $SO^+(1,\,2)\cong SO(1,\,2)$ whereas $SO^+(1,\,3)\not\cong SO(1,\,3)$.

Witness the following Mathematica session, to help you with these calculations:

In[1]:= Bx = {{0, 1, 0}, {1, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0}};
In[2]:= By = {{0, 0, 1}, {0, 0, 0}, {1, 0, 0}};
In[3]:= R = {{0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, -1}, {0, 1, 0}};

In[4]:= Lie[X_, Y_] := X.Y - Y.X

In[5]:= Lie[Bx, By] + R
Out[5]= {{0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0}}

In[6]:= Lie[Bx, R] + By
Out[6]= {{0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0}}

In[7]:= Lie[By, R] - Bx
Out[7]= {{0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0}}

In[8]:= MatrixExp[theta R].Bx.MatrixExp[-theta R] // Simplify
Out[8]= {{0, Cos[theta], Sin[theta]}, {Cos[theta], 0, 0}, {Sin[theta],0, 0}}

In[9]:= ExpToTrig[MatrixExp[eta MatrixExp[theta R].Bx.MatrixExp[-theta R]]] // Simplify

Out[9]= {{Cosh[eta], Cos[theta] Sinh[eta], 
  Sin[theta] Sinh[eta]}, {Cos[theta] Sinh[eta], 
  Cos[theta]^2 Cosh[eta] + Sin[theta]^2, 
  Cos[theta] (-1 + Cosh[eta]) Sin[theta]}, {Sin[theta] Sinh[eta], 
  Cos[theta] (-1 + Cosh[eta]) Sin[theta], 
  Cos[theta]^2 + Cosh[eta] Sin[theta]^2}}

In[10]:= ExpToTrig[MatrixExp[etax Bx + etay By]] // Simplify

Out[10]= {{Cosh[Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2]], (
  etax Sinh[Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2]])/Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2], (
  etay Sinh[Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2]])/Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2]}, {(
  etax Sinh[Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2]])/Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2], (
  etay^2 + etax^2 Cosh[Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2]])/(etax^2 + etay^2), (
  etax etay (-1 + Cosh[Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2]]))/(etax^2 + etay^2)}, {(
  etay Sinh[Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2]])/Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2], (
  etax etay (-1 + Cosh[Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2]]))/(etax^2 + etay^2), (
  etax^2 + etay^2 Cosh[Sqrt[etax^2 + etay^2]])/(etax^2 + etay^2)}}
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank for the answer. More of the textbooks would only teach us the 1-dimensional way, which results in the formula for 𝛽(𝜃,𝜂). I am curious about the exp(𝜂𝑥𝐵𝑥+𝜂𝑦𝐵𝑦) way. Do you have any reference on deriving the second way? $\endgroup$
    – Po C.
    Commented Mar 16, 2021 at 4:52
2
$\begingroup$

You should have two boost generators. You have constructed one for boost in the $x$ direction, but there is also one for boost in $y$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.