1
$\begingroup$

An accelerating electric charge will emit transverse electromagnetic waves. These waves are propagating away in wave fronts that become flatter and flatter as getting further from the source. So they will start to resemble a plane wave.

However, doesn't getting flatter mean the wave-lenght is getting smaller? How is that even possible in the first place? I thought the wave-length should be constant so the radio signal can retain its frequency!

$\endgroup$

3 Answers 3

2
$\begingroup$

Since the emitter is a point, the wave will never get "flatter". It will always look like a dipole pattern (for the non-relativistic case, for the relativistic case the forward and backward lobes become asymmetric, I believe, with a strong amplification of the emission into the forward cones, which should also become narrower). I think you are mistaking your mental image that stems from a selective magnification of the pattern's scale for the actual pattern. The "wavelength" for synchrotron radiation is not an easily defined quantity, since it's a broad spectrum. In the time domain the signal probably looks like a spike and like noise when many particles are involved.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Wait, just to clarify for my own edification, synchrotron radiation has a broad spectrum because the accelerated charged particles have a thermal spread, right? I thought the frequency of synchrotron was proportional to the cyclotron frequency of the emitter, and the radiation is just simple EM, so c = $\lambda$f, right? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 1, 2015 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ @honeste_vivere: To clarify: the spectrum of synchrotron radiation depends on the emitting system. Bremsstrahlung itself has an IR dominated spectrum, thermalized plasma has a spectrum that is dominated by the energy distribution of the electrons and radiation from sources like wigglers and undulators can be sharply peaked because these systems are engineered to make use of constructive interference (aka the name "free electron laser for some designs). My statement was about the most simple case of Bremsstrahlung without any other effects that filter for a more correlated spectrum. $\endgroup$
    – CuriousOne
    Commented Jan 1, 2015 at 18:47
1
$\begingroup$

The wavelength does of course remain the same. Think about two circles (representing wavefronts) evolving over time. Their respective radii increase at the same rate, such that the distance between them (the wavelength) always stays the same.

Now think about drawing a box of fixed size and placing it over the wavefronts. This represents your detector (or radio). At early times, with the box at a small distance from the centre, the wavefronts passing through the box might be noticeably curved. At later times when the wavefront radii are much larger, the same box would encapsulate what would approximate to two straight lines. In other words plane waves.

As perhaps you can see, the condition for this to be true is that the distance from the source must be much greater than the wavelength.

(Left) Expanding wavefronts at some time $t$. There is significant curvature seen inside the box (Right) Same wavefronts sometime later. Inside the box they are almost straight lines. NB: These spherically symmetric wavefronts would not be representative of an oscillating charge (which would have a dipole pattern), but whatever the wavefront shape, the argument about a decreasing radius of curvature holds true.

Expanding wavefronts

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

A accelerated electron emit photons which travel through space without any changes until they will be received by another particle. Radio waves are made from a lot of accelerated electrons in an antenna rod.

The radio wave one detect is modulated from antenna generator and contains the photons from the periodically accelerated electrons. The radio wave get weaker and weaker away from the antenna bar. That means the photons get distributed in a bigger and bigger volume, but the photons by himself don't changes. That is why a receiver can extract from only a tiny part of the radio wave informations.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.