Skip to main content
grammar fix
Source Link
John Rennie
  • 362.7k
  • 132
  • 780
  • 1.1k

w = fringe spacing
lambda = wavelength
D = horizontal distance between slits and screen
s = slit spacing

w = fringe spacing
$\lambda$ = wavelength
D = horizontal distance between slits and screen
s = slit spacing

d = slit spacing
theta = angle between central maximum and the ray at the nth maximum
lambda = wavelength

d = slit spacing
$\theta$ = angle between central maximum and the ray at the nth maximum
$\lambda$ = wavelength

I am an A Level physics student in the UK. The book I am referring to later on is the 'Advanced PHYSICS' 2nd edition by Steve Adams and Jonathan Allday.

I am confused about where the above equations work? Any number of slits or only double slits or some combination? What about theta? Does it have to be small, or can it be large (greater than 10 degrees)? I know that in both cases the slit spacing should be a lot smaller than the horizontal distance, but I am confused because the bottom equation is used for diffraction gratings, but the derivation was using the young's double slit experiment. However, the top equation was also derived using double slits in the book, yet I have never seen it being used for diffraction gratings. I tried to look for similar answers, but they were too detailed and a bit difficult to comprehend. So, I would appreciate a concise answer.

w = fringe spacing
lambda = wavelength
D = horizontal distance between slits and screen
s = slit spacing

d = slit spacing
theta = angle between central maximum and the ray at the nth maximum
lambda = wavelength

I am an A Level physics student in the UK. The book I am referring to later on is the 'Advanced PHYSICS' 2nd edition by Steve Adams and Jonathan Allday.

I am confused about where the above equations work? Any number of slits or only double slits or some combination? What about theta? Does it have to be small, or can it be large (greater than 10 degrees)? I know that in both cases the slit spacing should be a lot smaller than the horizontal distance, but I am confused because the bottom equation is used for diffraction gratings, but the derivation was using the young's double slit experiment. However, the top equation was also derived using double slits in the book, yet I have never seen it being used for diffraction gratings. I tried to look for similar answers, but they were too detailed and a bit difficult to comprehend. So, I would appreciate a concise answer.

w = fringe spacing
$\lambda$ = wavelength
D = horizontal distance between slits and screen
s = slit spacing

d = slit spacing
$\theta$ = angle between central maximum and the ray at the nth maximum
$\lambda$ = wavelength

I am an A Level physics student in the UK. The book I am referring to later on is the 'Advanced PHYSICS' 2nd edition by Steve Adams and Jonathan Allday.

I am confused about where the above equations work? Any number of slits or only double slits or some combination? What about theta? Does it have to be small, or can it be large (greater than 10 degrees)? I know that in both cases the slit spacing should be a lot smaller than the horizontal distance, but I am confused because the bottom equation is used for diffraction gratings, but the derivation was using the young's double slit experiment. However, the top equation was also derived using double slits in the book, yet I have never seen it being used for diffraction gratings. I tried to look for similar answers, but they were too detailed and a bit difficult to comprehend. So, I would appreciate a concise answer.

w=fringe spacing, lambda = wavelength, D = horizontal distance between slits and screen, s = slit spacing.

w = fringe spacing
lambda = wavelength
D = horizontal distance between slits and screen
s = slit spacing

d = slit spacing, theta = angle between central maximum and the ray at the nth maximum, lamba = wavelength.

d = slit spacing
theta = angle between central maximum and the ray at the nth maximum
lambda = wavelength

Hi, I am an A Level physics student in the UK. The book I am referring to later on is the 'Advanced PHYSICS' 2nd edition by Steve Adams and Jonathan Allday.

I am confused about where the above equations work? Any number of slits or only double slits or some combination? What about theta? doesDoes it have to be small, or can it be large (greater than 10 degrees)? I know that in both cases the slit spacing should be a lot smaller than the horizontal distance, but I am confused because the bottom equation is used for diffraction gratings, but the derivation was using the young's double slit experiment. However, the top equation was also derived using double slits in the book, yet I have never seen it being used for diffraction gratings. I tried to look for similar answers, but they were too detailed and a bit difficult to comprehend. So, I would appreciate a concise answer.

w=fringe spacing, lambda = wavelength, D = horizontal distance between slits and screen, s = slit spacing.

d = slit spacing, theta = angle between central maximum and the ray at the nth maximum, lamba = wavelength.

Hi, I am an A Level physics student in the UK. The book I am referring to later on is the 'Advanced PHYSICS' 2nd edition by Steve Adams and Jonathan Allday.

I am confused about where the above equations work? Any number of slits or only double slits or some combination? What about theta? does it have to be small or can it be large (greater than 10 degrees)? I know that in both cases the slit spacing should be a lot smaller than the horizontal distance, but I am confused because the bottom equation is used for diffraction gratings but the derivation was using the young's double slit experiment. However, the top equation was also derived using double slits in the book yet I have never seen it being used for diffraction gratings. I tried to look for similar answers but they were too detailed and a bit difficult to comprehend. So, I would appreciate a concise answer.

w = fringe spacing
lambda = wavelength
D = horizontal distance between slits and screen
s = slit spacing

d = slit spacing
theta = angle between central maximum and the ray at the nth maximum
lambda = wavelength

I am an A Level physics student in the UK. The book I am referring to later on is the 'Advanced PHYSICS' 2nd edition by Steve Adams and Jonathan Allday.

I am confused about where the above equations work? Any number of slits or only double slits or some combination? What about theta? Does it have to be small, or can it be large (greater than 10 degrees)? I know that in both cases the slit spacing should be a lot smaller than the horizontal distance, but I am confused because the bottom equation is used for diffraction gratings, but the derivation was using the young's double slit experiment. However, the top equation was also derived using double slits in the book, yet I have never seen it being used for diffraction gratings. I tried to look for similar answers, but they were too detailed and a bit difficult to comprehend. So, I would appreciate a concise answer.

Source Link

Where does the diffraction equations work and why?

w=fringe spacing, lambda = wavelength, D = horizontal distance between slits and screen, s = slit spacing.

d = slit spacing, theta = angle between central maximum and the ray at the nth maximum, lamba = wavelength.

Hi, I am an A Level physics student in the UK. The book I am referring to later on is the 'Advanced PHYSICS' 2nd edition by Steve Adams and Jonathan Allday.

I am confused about where the above equations work? Any number of slits or only double slits or some combination? What about theta? does it have to be small or can it be large (greater than 10 degrees)? I know that in both cases the slit spacing should be a lot smaller than the horizontal distance, but I am confused because the bottom equation is used for diffraction gratings but the derivation was using the young's double slit experiment. However, the top equation was also derived using double slits in the book yet I have never seen it being used for diffraction gratings. I tried to look for similar answers but they were too detailed and a bit difficult to comprehend. So, I would appreciate a concise answer.