Skip to main content
deleted 2 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
ProfRob
  • 136.8k
  • 16
  • 303
  • 487

Satellite around a black hole rather than the Earth

Let's say there's some satellite revolving around the Earth. Its orbital velocity would be

   $$v=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{r}}.$$

Evidently, this is independent of the distribution of the mass of the earthEarth, and that implies that even if we manage to compress the Earth to the Schwarzschild Radius, it will not affect the motion of the satellite. But I find it hard to believe that there's a black hole right there but the satellite is revolving as usual. Am I going wrong somewhere?

Satellite around a black hole

Let's say there's some satellite revolving around the Earth. Its orbital velocity would be

 $$v=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{r}}.$$

Evidently, this is independent of the distribution of the mass of the earth, and that implies that even if we manage to compress the Earth to the Schwarzschild Radius, it will not affect the motion of the satellite. But I find it hard to believe that there's a black hole right there but the satellite is revolving as usual. Am I going wrong somewhere?

Satellite around a black hole rather than the Earth

Let's say there's some satellite revolving around the Earth. Its orbital velocity would be  $$v=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{r}}.$$

Evidently, this is independent of the distribution of the mass of the Earth, and that implies that even if we manage to compress the Earth to the Schwarzschild Radius, it will not affect the motion of the satellite. But I find it hard to believe that there's a black hole right there but the satellite is revolving as usual. Am I going wrong somewhere?

added 1 character in body
Source Link
Ambica Govind
  • 1.6k
  • 2
  • 11
  • 27

Let's say there's some satellite revolving around the Earth. Its orbital velocity would be

$$v=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{r}}.$$

Evidently, this is independent of the orientationdistribution of the mass of the earth, and that implies that even if we manage to compress the Earth to the Schwarzschild Radius, it will not affect the motion of the satellite. But I find it hard to believe that there's a black hole right there but the satellite is revolving as usual. Am I going wrong somewhere?

Let's say there's some satellite revolving around the Earth. Its orbital velocity would be

$$v=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{r}}.$$

Evidently, this is independent of the orientation of the mass of the earth, and that implies that even if we manage to compress the Earth to the Schwarzschild Radius, it will not affect the motion of the satellite. But I find it hard to believe that there's a black hole right there but the satellite is revolving as usual. Am I going wrong somewhere?

Let's say there's some satellite revolving around the Earth. Its orbital velocity would be

$$v=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{r}}.$$

Evidently, this is independent of the distribution of the mass of the earth, and that implies that even if we manage to compress the Earth to the Schwarzschild Radius, it will not affect the motion of the satellite. But I find it hard to believe that there's a black hole right there but the satellite is revolving as usual. Am I going wrong somewhere?

edited tags
Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
added 2 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
SG8
  • 4.6k
  • 2
  • 16
  • 46
Loading
deleted 57 characters in body
Source Link
Urb
  • 2.7k
  • 4
  • 14
  • 26
Loading
Source Link
Ambica Govind
  • 1.6k
  • 2
  • 11
  • 27
Loading