Why is Hubble's Constant exactly the inverse of the age of the universe?

This cannot be coincidence. If according to our laws of physics this bus coincidence then surely we have got something worked out wrong.

If this 'coincidence' we're to continue, it proves that Hubble's Constant must be decreasing. Furthermore, does it imply that expansion if the universe is asymptotic?

Why is Hubble's Constant exactly the inverse of the age of the universe?

This cannot be coincidence. If according to our laws of physics this is coincidence then surely we have got something worked out wrong.

If this 'coincidence' were to continue, it proves that Hubble's Constant must be decreasing. Furthermore, does it imply that expansion if the universe is asymptotic?

Why is Hubble's Constant exactly the inverse of the age of the universe?

This cannot be coincidence. If according to our laws of physics this bus coincidence then surely we have got something worked out wrong.

If this 'coincidence' we're to continue, it proves that Hubble's Constant must be decreasing.

Why is Hubble's Constant exactly the inverse of the age of the universe?

This cannot be coincidence. If according to our laws of physics this bus coincidence then surely we have got something worked out wrong.

If this 'coincidence' we're to continue, it proves that Hubble's Constant must be decreasing. Furthermore, does it imply that expansion if the universe is asymptotic?