Skip to main content
Question Protected by Qmechanic
Formatting fixes.
Source Link
Emilio Pisanty
  • 135.4k
  • 33
  • 358
  • 677

Why do we still not have an exact (constants-based) definition for a kilogram?

I read that there is an effort to define a kilogram in terms that can exactly be reproduced in a lab. Why has it taken so long to get this done? It seems this would seem this should be fairly important.

Edit

Edit: Today I got around to finding the references.
You

You can see the international prototype of the kilogram IPK is the artifact whose mass defines at present the SI unit of mass here. You can also go here where you will see a link on the possible future revision to the SI. It sounds like this may happen in the next few years. 

I am not surprised that it takes years of R&D and millions of dollars to do this. WellHowever, that's peanuts compared to what was spent on LHC. I am not saying LHC was not worth the cost. It - it just seems that we could have a modern definition of a kilogram by now if a few governments wanted to make it a priority. 

Does anyone here know if this effort has been given the investment that it deserves?

Why do we still not have an exact definition for a kilogram?

I read that there is an effort to define a kilogram in terms that can exactly be reproduced in a lab. Why has it taken so long to get this done? It seems this would be fairly important.

Edit

Today I got around to finding the references.
You can see the international prototype of the kilogram IPK is the artifact whose mass defines at present the SI unit of mass here. You can also go here where you will see a link on the possible future revision to the SI. It sounds like this may happen in the next few years. I am not surprised that it takes years of R&D and millions of dollars to do this. Well that's peanuts compared to what was spent on LHC. I am not saying LHC was not worth the cost. It just seems we could have a modern definition of a kilogram by now if a few governments wanted to make it a priority. Does anyone here know if this effort has been given the investment that it deserves?

Why do we still not have an exact (constants-based) definition for a kilogram?

I read that there is an effort to define a kilogram in terms that can exactly be reproduced in a lab. Why has it taken so long to get this done? It would seem this should be fairly important.

Edit: Today I got around to finding the references.

You can see the international prototype of the kilogram IPK is the artifact whose mass defines at present the SI unit of mass here. You can also go here where you will see a link on the possible future revision to the SI. It sounds like this may happen in the next few years. 

I am not surprised that it takes years of R&D and millions of dollars to do this. However, that's peanuts compared to what was spent on LHC. I am not saying LHC was not worth the cost - it just seems that we could have a modern definition of a kilogram by now if a few governments wanted to make it a priority. 

Does anyone here know if this effort has been given the investment that it deserves?

edited tags
Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
correct spell
Source Link
FrankH
  • 10.8k
  • 1
  • 46
  • 71

I read that there is an effort to define a kilogram in terms that can exactly be reproduced in a lab. Why has it taken soooso long to get this done? It seems this would be fairly important.

Edit

Today I got around to finding the references.
You can see the international prototype of the kilogram IPK is the artefactartifact whose mass defines at present the SI unit of mass here. You can also go here where you will see a link on the possible future revision to the SI. It sounds like this may happen in the next few years. I am not surprised that it takes years of R&D and millions of dollorsdollars to do this. Well that's peanuts cumparedcompared to what was spent on LHC. I am not saying LHC was not worhtworth the cost. It just seems we could have a modern definition of a kilogram by now if a few governments wanted to make it a priority. Does anyooneanyone here know if this effort has been given the investment that it deserves?

I read that there is an effort to define a kilogram in terms that can exactly be reproduced in a lab. Why has it taken sooo long to get this done? It seems this would be fairly important.

Edit

Today I got around to finding the references.
You can see the international prototype of the kilogram IPK is the artefact whose mass defines at present the SI unit of mass here. You can also go here where you will see a link on the possible future revision to the SI. It sounds like this may happen in the next few years. I am not surprised that it takes years of R&D and millions of dollors to do this. Well that's peanuts cumpared to what was spent on LHC. I am not saying LHC was not worht the cost. It just seems we could have a modern definition of a kilogram by now if a few governments wanted to make it a priority. Does anyoone here know if this effort has been given the investment that it deserves?

I read that there is an effort to define a kilogram in terms that can exactly be reproduced in a lab. Why has it taken so long to get this done? It seems this would be fairly important.

Edit

Today I got around to finding the references.
You can see the international prototype of the kilogram IPK is the artifact whose mass defines at present the SI unit of mass here. You can also go here where you will see a link on the possible future revision to the SI. It sounds like this may happen in the next few years. I am not surprised that it takes years of R&D and millions of dollars to do this. Well that's peanuts compared to what was spent on LHC. I am not saying LHC was not worth the cost. It just seems we could have a modern definition of a kilogram by now if a few governments wanted to make it a priority. Does anyone here know if this effort has been given the investment that it deserves?

Added details on the current status of redefining the kilogram, with web-links.
Source Link
Ted Ersek
  • 531
  • 1
  • 4
  • 9
Loading
retagged;; edited tags
Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
Loading
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/224769204786708480
Source Link
Ted Ersek
  • 531
  • 1
  • 4
  • 9
Loading