Timeline for How can you be a realist and not posit an ontological model?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 20, 2016 at 10:28 | comment | added | Stéphane Rollandin | @PhysicsFootnotes. Yes, the Flash Ontology is another one of these ideas redefining the nature of spacetime I am referring to in my answer. | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 7:07 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/800233977063866369 | ||
| Nov 19, 2016 at 23:16 | comment | added | Physics Footnotes | There are ontic interpretations of GRW and GRW-like theories (e.g. Bell's so-called Flash Ontology) which don't strike me as having the form described in that video (although I can't say I'm sure). Here's a good talk by Tim Maudlin that might give you a bit of insight into the issue: youtube.com/watch?v=4tAddvSHRDo | |
| Nov 19, 2016 at 0:21 | answer | added | Stéphane Rollandin | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 18, 2016 at 22:58 | comment | added | Count Iblis | Listen at 20 minutes and 2o seconds into the talk for about one minute. | |
| Nov 18, 2016 at 22:01 | answer | added | Ken G | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 18, 2016 at 17:43 | comment | added | Emilio Pisanty | @Danu The system did issue an automated warning, but I think this is perfectly on-topic. A working quantum-interpretations expert described a category of interpretations that I don't understand, and I would like to know how those look like. I don't care whether those interpretations are "right" or "wrong" (which is of course meaningless and off-topic) - I just want to know what they are. | |
| Nov 18, 2016 at 17:38 | comment | added | Danu | Exploring the boundaries of on-topicness? ;) | |
| Nov 18, 2016 at 17:28 | history | asked | Emilio Pisanty | CC BY-SA 3.0 |