Timeline for Numerical simulation of the double-slit experiment including watching the electrons
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
29 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2022 at 15:43 | answer | added | David | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 8, 2022 at 14:53 | answer | added | Erna | timeline score: 0 | |
| S Mar 23, 2017 at 10:56 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Mar 23, 2017 at 10:56 | history | notice removed | user130529 | ||
| Mar 22, 2017 at 11:26 | answer | added | Emilio Pisanty | timeline score: 10 | |
| Mar 22, 2017 at 11:07 | comment | added | Arturs C. | Something similar has actually been done experimentally with fullerenes, see doi: 10.1038/44348 Scattered photons would end up entangled with your electrons. Measuring those photons could destroy your interference pattern, if the measurement can tell you which slit the electron went through. | |
| Mar 22, 2017 at 9:11 | answer | added | alanf | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 22, 2017 at 6:19 | answer | added | deechitpoudel | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 19, 2017 at 5:53 | answer | added | HolgerFiedler | timeline score: -1 | |
| S Mar 16, 2017 at 13:17 | history | bounty started | CommunityBot | ||
| S Mar 16, 2017 at 13:17 | history | notice added | user130529 | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Jan 23, 2017 at 11:08 | answer | added | Bruce | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Oct 3, 2016 at 3:03 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Oct 3, 2016 at 3:03 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Sep 26, 2016 at 6:54 | history | edited | user130529 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added slow electron option
|
| Sep 25, 2016 at 9:52 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/779981770905321472 | ||
| S Sep 25, 2016 at 1:26 | history | bounty started | Alfred Centauri | ||
| S Sep 25, 2016 at 1:26 | history | notice added | Alfred Centauri | Draw attention | |
| S Sep 23, 2016 at 14:03 | history | mod moved comments to chat | |||
| S Sep 23, 2016 at 14:03 | comment | added | David Z | Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. | |
| Sep 23, 2016 at 5:57 | history | reopened |
peterh Brandon Enright Dilaton Emilio Pisanty Rococo |
||
| Sep 20, 2016 at 20:37 | history | edited | user130529 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I added motivation of interest for the result of such a numerical simulation, after ACuriousMind request.
|
| Sep 19, 2016 at 16:36 | history | edited | user130529 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Sep 19, 2016 at 9:20 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Sep 23, 2016 at 6:02 | |||||
| Sep 19, 2016 at 9:02 | history | edited | user130529 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved the description of the "thought experiment"
|
| Sep 18, 2016 at 22:55 | history | closed |
Norbert Schuch user36790 auden ACuriousMind♦ Jon Custer |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Sep 18, 2016 at 16:54 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 18, 2016 at 22:55 | |||||
| Sep 18, 2016 at 16:10 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 18, 2016 at 17:42 | |||||
| Sep 18, 2016 at 16:02 | history | asked | user130529 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |