1
$\begingroup$

According to Euler's rotation theorem, simultaneous rotation along a number of stationary axes at the same time is impossible. If two rotations are forced at the same time, a new axis of rotation will appear. - wikipedia

so can we say that the new axis of rotation is just the resultant of the previous too ?

Can you kindly explain this to me ? And show ( with some examples ) how can we mathematically predict this new axis of rotation ?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ kindly give some example of two "generalized rotations" happening simultaneously about two stationary axes- to get a picture of your problem! $\endgroup$
    – drvrm
    Commented Mar 12, 2016 at 12:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For Euler's rotation theorem, see physics.stackexchange.com/q/19201/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic ♦
    Commented Mar 12, 2016 at 13:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Euler's rotation theorem applies only in odd dimensional spaces, and the notion of treating angular velocity as a vector is specific to three dimensional space. In four dimensional space, it is possible to have an object undergoing two simple rotations. $\endgroup$
    – David Hammen
    Commented Mar 12, 2016 at 14:40
  • $\begingroup$ Sir, so in two-dimensional plane how can a object have two simple rotations ? $\endgroup$
    – Subhranil Sinha
    Commented Mar 12, 2016 at 15:16

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

Let us say you have a sequence of rotations about two axes, $\hat{x}$ and $\hat{y}$ by the angles $\varphi$ and $\theta$. You use rotation matrices to find the final orientation

$$ \mathtt{E} = {\rm Rot}(\hat{x},\varphi)\,{\rm Rot}(\hat{y},\theta) $$

Now lets add some motion, and give the angles some speed

$$ \begin{align} \dot{\varphi} & = \frac{{\rm d}\varphi}{{\rm d}t} \\ \dot{\theta} & = \frac{{\rm d}\theta}{{\rm d}t} \end{align} $$

The rotational velocity of this body is thus defined as

$$ \vec{\omega} = \hat{x} \dot{\varphi} + {\rm Rot}(\hat{x},\varphi) \hat{y} \dot{\theta} $$

This is because $\hat{y}$ rotates about $\hat{x}$.

This motion is decomposed onto a rotation axis $\hat{z}$ and a rotation magnitude $\omega$

$$ \omega = \| \hat{x} \dot{\varphi} + {\rm Rot}(\hat{x},\varphi) \hat{y} \dot{\theta} \| \\ \hat{z} = \frac{\vec{\omega}}{\omega} $$

Appendix I

To derive this you use the fact that the time derivative of a rotation matrix $\mathtt{E}$ is $$\dot{\mathtt{E}} = \vec{\omega} \times \mathtt{E}$$

Use the product rule to evaluate the left hand side (with $\mathtt{E} = \mathtt{R}_x \mathtt{R}_y$) as $$\begin{align}\dot{\mathtt{E}} &= \left( \frac{{\rm d}}{{\rm d}t} \mathtt{R}_x \right) \mathtt{R}_y + \mathtt{R}_x \left(\frac{{\rm d}}{{\rm d}t} \mathtt{R}_y \right)\\ &= ((\hat{x} \dot{\varphi}) \times \mathtt{R}_x ) \mathtt{R}_y +\mathtt{R}_x ( (\hat{y} \dot{\theta})\times \mathtt{R}_y) \\ &= (\hat{x} \dot{\varphi}) \times (\mathtt{R}_x \mathtt{R}_y) + (\mathtt{R}_x \hat{y} \dot{\theta})\times (\mathtt{R}_x \mathtt{R}_y) \\ &= (\hat{x} \dot{\varphi} + \mathtt{R}_x \hat{y} \dot{\theta}) \times (\mathtt{R}_x \mathtt{R}_y) \\ &= \vec{\omega} \times \mathtt{E} \,.\end{align}$$

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.