Skip to main content
sidewaiise's user avatar
sidewaiise's user avatar
sidewaiise's user avatar
sidewaiise
  • Member for 10 years, 2 months
  • Last seen more than 5 years ago
awarded
awarded
comment
Does the Doppler effect disprove the constancy of $c$?
Easy to confuse velocity with frequency. I think your question should be 'in what ways could c be varied for a given photon?'. Perhaps if a photon was near a black hole, we would see c alter for that case. You have some great answers which clarify here already though.
comment
What underlying structure/framework defines the charge of an antiparticle or regular particle (specifically a proton)?
Anna, thanks. I guess I'm trying to envision a mechanical or quantum-mechanical process at tiny time intervals - the things that occur that we might have some control over some day that determine a quark's existence and state.
Loading…
comment
What underlying structure/framework defines the charge of an antiparticle or regular particle (specifically a proton)?
Thanks anna, your answer deserves a tick. It does however still stump me - the governing factors that determine a quark's state and existence.
comment
What underlying structure/framework defines the charge of an antiparticle or regular particle (specifically a proton)?
Thanks @JohnRennie, its good to know someone else out there is notably stumped by this one.
comment
What underlying structure/framework defines the charge of an antiparticle or regular particle (specifically a proton)?
I found this page: hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/particles/quark.html which contains a table of Quarks and their respective charges/masses. Does this imply that an anti-proton may have a different combination of quarks in it, or a set of antiquarks which are of exactly opposite charge?
comment
What underlying structure/framework defines the charge of an antiparticle or regular particle (specifically a proton)?
Thanks @dmckee for answering. Of course this makes sense. What governs the quark's state though? How does it have a charge in the first place? (sorry if this is so basic). Your answer will probably relate to the conservation of energy.
Loading…
comment
Is it possible for larger antimatter atoms to decay to matter and visa versa?
I see - so an electron pair (+-) are created and have opposite velocities on creation/exit? So energy is conserved. I'm still hung up on the proton though - it's a much larger particle. Just reading up on current production methods for anti-hydrogen.
comment
Is it possible for larger antimatter atoms to decay to matter and visa versa?
Thanks for that, conservation of energy is a very reasonable explanation. In beta-decay there are anti-particles - this is an example of an anti-particle coming from a regular particle. What goes on in that process to allow for it?
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
Is it possible for larger antimatter atoms to decay to matter and visa versa?
I guess the question should have been... what is the mechanism for a particle becoming anti-matter or matter?
answered
Loading…