Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 86781

Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is the theoretical framework describing the quantisation of classical fields which allows a Lorentz-invariant formulation of quantum mechanics. QFT is used both in high energy physics as well as condensed matter physics and closely related to statistical field theory. Use this tag for many-body quantum-mechanical problems and the theory of particle physics. Don’t combine with the [quantum-mechanics] tag.

0 votes
1 answer
360 views

Is the scalar field operator self-adjoint?

In A. Zee's QFT in a Nutshell, he defines the field for the Klein-Gordon equation as $$ \tag{1}\varphi(\vec x,t) = \int\frac{d^Dk}{\sqrt{(2\pi)^D2\omega_k}}[a(\vec k)e^{-i(\omega_kt-\vec k\cdot\vec x) …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
0 votes
1 answer
228 views

Excitation source in 2D grid coupled harmonic oscillator

In A. Zee's Quantum field theory in a Nutshell, he describes the QFT analogy of a matress, a 2D grid of points $q_a$ connected by springs (first page of first chapter, $q_a$ is the vertical displaceme …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
4 votes
1 answer
2k views

Zee's Nutshell: Feynman diagrams "baby problem": Connected vs. Disconnected

On page 47 of A. Zee's QFT in a Nutshell, he explains how disconnected Feynman diagrams can be built from lower-order connected diagrams: I don't know how to understand formula $(6)$. I understand …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
2 votes
Accepted

Is a Feynman diagram depicting a vacuum bubble "that gets real" valid?

As explained by @ACuriousMind, even the diagrams with vacuum bubbles that "come to life" are correct Feynman diagrams. However, when one translates the diagrams to actual amplitude terms, these terms …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
2 votes
1 answer
880 views

How to separate an exponential with a Hamiltonian with both momentum and position operators?

Statement of exercise On a page 11 of A.Zee's book QFT in a Nutshell, he derives Dirac's formulation of the path integral formulation of QM for a free particle. This starts with the free particle Ham …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
3 votes
1 answer
2k views

Is a Feynman diagram depicting a vacuum bubble "that gets real" valid?

In exercise I.7.3 of A. Zee's QFT in a Nutshell, we have to draw all the Feynman diagrams of the scalar theory $$ Z(J) = \int D\varphi e^{i\int d^4x\{\frac 12[(\partial\varphi)^2-m^2\varphi^2]-(\lamb …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
7 votes
1 answer
1k views

What prevents this third-order QED scattering from having a non-zero amplitude?

I have learned that in the Dyson-Wick expansion of the QED scattering operator $$ S=e^{-i\int_{t_i}^{t_f}H\mathrm{d}t} $$ with the QED interaction Lagrangian $$ H=e\bar\psi\gamma^\mu A_\mu\psi $$ …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
3 votes
3 answers
3k views

Do different creation/annihilation operators always commute?

In a complex (non-hermitian) scalar QFT, is it correct that the creation/annihilation operators $a,a^\dagger$ (particle) and $b,b^\dagger$ (anti-particle) commute, i.e. $[a,b] = [a,b^\dagger] = [a^\da …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
11 votes
2 answers
922 views

Why is a minimum field configuration called a vacuum state in SSB?

Most explanations of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB) go like this: They take a scalar field Lagrangian with the "Mexican hat" potential $V(\phi)=−10\phi^2+\phi^4$ and argue that since the potentia …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
8 votes
1 answer
2k views

How to show that $\bar\psi\psi$ of a Dirac spinor $\psi$ transforms as a scalar?

I would like to show that for a Dirac spinor $\psi$, the scalar product $\bar\psi\psi$ transforms as a scalar under a Lorentz transformation $\Lambda$, where $\bar\psi = \psi^\dagger\gamma^0$. This is …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
11 votes
1 answer
2k views

How to show that $\bar\psi\gamma^\mu\psi$ of a Dirac spinor $\psi$ transforms as a vector?

This is part 2 of exercise II.1.1 of Zee's QFT in a Nutshell (here's part 1). This is what I have got: \begin{align} \bar\psi\gamma^\lambda\psi \mapsto \bar\psi^{\,\prime}\gamma^\lambda\psi^{\,\prim …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
4 votes
0 answers
292 views

What's the connection between the pole contours of propagators and their causality?

Wikipedia distinguishes between three kinds of propagators for a scalar field: The Retarded propagator's contours have $\mathrm{Im}(k^0)>0$ on both poles, so its limit is completely in the first and …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
2 votes
0 answers
556 views

Spin and polarization, QM vs QFT

On page 34 of A. Zee's book QFT in a Nutshell, he states: I expect you to remember the concept of polarization from your course on electromagnetism. A massive spin 1 particle has three degrees of …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507
1 vote
0 answers
1k views

How to Fourier transform creation/annihilation operators?

Zee's QFT in a Nutshell pages 65-66. For a complex scalar QFT $$ \varphi(\vec{x},t) = \int\frac{d^Dk}{\sqrt{(2\pi)^D2\omega_k}}\left[a(\vec{k})\mathrm{e}^{-i(\omega_kt-\vec{k}\cdot\vec{x})} + b^\dagg …
Bass's user avatar
  • 1,507