Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with electromagnetism
Search options not deleted
user 3036
The classical theory of electric and magnetic fields, both in the static and dynamic case. It also covers general questions about magnets, electric attraction/repulsion, etc. Distinct from electrical-engineering.
0
votes
1
answer
38
views
How to compute $\chi_1$, a Lorentzian absorption in the following paper?
I have the following paper:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.01213
on the third page, where they take: $$\chi_2(\omega)= \frac{-k\gamma}{(\omega-\omega_0)^2+\gamma^2},$$ I don't see how to explicitly comput …
