Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 204834

Hypothetical situation in which, for simplification, only some physical aspects are considered in order to further understand or reveal contradictions between the laws governing them.

1 vote

In special relativity, how do we know that distance doesn't change in the direction perpendi...

We can simply derive this from the Lorentz transform. With the $x$ direction parallel and the $y$, $z$ directions perpendicular the Lorentz transform is: $$t'=\gamma \left(t-\frac{vx}{c^2} \right)$$ $ …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
0 votes

Can you resolve this special relativity paradox?

Alice reasons that it will be impossible for the crate launch to be timed in such a way, that the crate will snuggly slide through the window, without one of the crate's faces colliding with the wind …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
0 votes
Accepted

Behaviour of clocks and measuring rods on a rotating frame of reference

The Coriolis force is not mentioned above because the disk and the observer are all at rest in the rotating frame. As soon as something is moving in the rotating frame then the Coriolis force will bec …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
0 votes

Hidden variable special relativity paradox

Typically we would not consider each mirror to constitute a “tick” but rather a full round trip. However, that is rather minor and is just a small semantic issue. The resolution to this paradox is tha …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
4 votes
Accepted

Einstein's train thought experiment

My question is why is it being assumed that the earth frame observer seeing that the ahead flash hits the observer in the train first imply that the train observer would also see the ahead flash firs …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
3 votes

Moon paradox 2.0

Suppose that Angie flips a coin and wants to communicate to Billy the result of that flip. This is what is meant by “information”. She may communicate the result of the flip by drawing different symbo …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
2 votes

Modification of Einstein's thought experiment; time dilation and simultaneity in moving frame

So how can we say or prove time dilation in a moving frame or disprove simultaneity using this thought experiment? Am I wrong somewhere? Let’s step away from thought experiments for a moment and …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
3 votes

If an object had an acceleration only in the time dimension relative to an observer, what wo...

There is a bit of confusion in this question. In the title it says “acceleration only in the time dimension” and in the body of the question it says “moving away in the time dimension only”. The latte …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
1 vote

Which energy is lost by an oscillating charge?

Now since it is left on its own (with no external disturbing i.e. no external work) its kinetic and potential energy should just keep transforming into one another and lost of one must appear in the …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
4 votes

If a clock is moved along a crooked path half as fast, and thus for twice as long, is the to...

it would be convenient if there was a way to synchronize the clocks perfectly (or near as darn it) The easier way is to equip the lattice clocks with radio transmitters and receivers and synchronize …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
0 votes

Simultaneity in Special Relativity (conflicting times in thought experiment)

What am I doing wrong? In your analysis of the situation in the embankment view you said that the position of the front of the train is given by $\frac{l}{2}+V t'$ but because of length contraction …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
5 votes

Special relativity paradox involving two light clocks

Typically we would not consider each mirror to constitute a “tick” but rather a full round trip. However, that is rather minor and is just a small semantic issue. In principle your analysis is correct …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
5 votes

Photonic clock and diagonal path (again)

But yet, how does light "decides" to agree (by going straight) with one point of view instead of the other ? Light doesn’t decide anything. It simply follows Maxwell’s equations. Different frames ar …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
4 votes

A Hidden Principle in Relativity

In every thought experiment we state that observers should agree on what is happening in some way. Problem is that this is not always true! If I state that observers in different frames should agree …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k
1 vote

Length contraction from a contracted frame of reference (thought experiment)

You are not making a mistake, except in thinking that this is a problem. As always, the key to solving this dilemma is the relativity of simultaneity. For simplicity consider the following geometry: i …
Dale's user avatar
  • 109k

15 30 50 per page