Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Second quantization or canonical quantization in quantum field theory and many-body systems is the collective organizing and accounting of an infinity of quantum excitations and their interactions through quantum field operators.
0
votes
0
answers
87
views
chemical potential in zero bandwidt s-f model
I have to compute the chemical potential in the zero bandwidth s-f model, analized in this article, from the following condition
$$
n=\left\langle\hat{n}_{\uparrow}\right\rangle+\left\langle\hat{n}_{ …
0
votes
0
answers
93
views
Expectation value through spectral theorem in s-f Model
The model that i am studying is the s-f model.
I wrote some post about it, then, in order to understund better my notation go to this question
Now, I am computing some parameters that emerge out of …
0
votes
1
answer
95
views
Commutation rules between itinerant and localized electron operators in s-f Model
The s-f Model is a model who could describe the $\textbf{magnetic 4 $\textit{f}$ systems}$, i.e systems where we could identify localized electrons in $4\,\textit{f}$ orbitals and conductions electro …
1
vote
Momentum Space Representation of the Tight Binding Hamiltonian
In (2) we can substitute
$t^{\alpha,\beta}_{\mathbf{R}_{1}-\mathbf{R}_{0},\mathbf{R}_{2}-\mathbf{R}_{0}}$. Then since the left hand side of (2) does not depend on $\mathbf{R}_{0}$, if we sum on it w …
1
vote
1
answer
515
views
Momentum Space Representation of the Tight Binding Hamiltonian
I am trying to represent the tight-binding Hamiltonian
\begin{equation}
\hat{H}_{TB} = \sum_{\sigma} \sum_{\alpha,\beta} \sum_{\mathbf{R}_1,\mathbf{R}_2}
t^{\alpha,\beta}_{\mathbf{R}_1,\mathbf{R}_2}
…
0
votes
Plasmons : doubts about the derivation of the Heisenberg equation of electrons' density
As regard the first doubt,
From the delta Kronecker we have
$$
\vec{k}_1-\vec{k}_4 = \vec{k}_3-\vec{k}_2
$$
so
\begin{align*}
\vec{q}'&=\vec{k}_1-\vec{k}_4
\\
&=\frac{1}{2}\left(\vec{k}_1 - \vec{k} …
0
votes
1
answer
69
views
Plasmons : doubts about the derivation of the Heisenberg equation of electrons' density
I'm studying plasmons from "Haken-Quantum Field Theory of Solids", and i need some help in the calculation of the equation of motion of eletrons' density
\begin{equation}
\hat{\rho}_{\overrightarrow{q …