0
$\begingroup$

I studied in my class, that a plane progressive wave cannot be used to represent the wave nature of a particle as it is not square integrable. Also, the phase velocity can get above the value of $c$, the speed of light. A simplistic argument can be- $$v_{phase}=\frac{\omega}{k}=\frac{E}{p}=\frac{mc^2}{mv_{particle}}=\frac{c^2}{v_{particle}}$$ (using de Broglie's formula and Planck's formula) Since $v_{particle}<c$, hence $v_{phase}>c$. Thus we use not a simple wave, but instead a superposition of multiple waves, which represents a wave packet. Wave packets, as far as I know, should have a varying amplitude.

While deriving Schrodinger equation, why don't we treat the amplitude $A$ as variable quantity? Am I missing something?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

A monochromatic wave has a fixed amplitude :

$\psi(x,t) = A ~e^{i(k.x-wt)}$

However, a wave packet (WP) is a combination of monochromatic waves :

$\psi_{WP}(x,t) = \int d\tilde k ~A(k) ~e^{i(k.x-wt)}$.

where $A(k)$ is a complex quantity.

So, $\psi_{WP}(x,t)$ is a complex quantity, which of course, can always be written :

$\psi_{WP}(x,t) = A_{WP}(x,t) e^{i\phi_{WP}(x,t)}$, where $\phi_{WP}(x,t)$ is a real phase, and $A_{WP}(x,t)$ is a real quantity, which is variable.

Now, the Schrodinger equation, is considering the whole wave packet $\psi_{WP}(x,t)$ as a probability amplitude (PA) $\psi_{PA}(x,t)$ (so, it is no more a real wave function).

With the decomposition $\psi_{PA}(x,t) = A_{PA}(x,t) e^{i\phi_{PA}(x,t)}$, the probability to find the particle at position $x$, at time $t$, is then just $|\psi_{PA}(x,t)|^2 = (A_{PA}(x,t))^2$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Splitting the wave function into amplitude/phase is also done in the WKB approximation. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 23, 2013 at 18:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.