0
$\begingroup$

I was trying to think through the consequences of Einstein's observation that a freely falling body does not experience its own weight. And, as freely falling (or "inertial") bodies will always move like this unless acted on by an external force, then the obvious question presented itself, do we ever feel the effect of gravity, or is what we commonly refer to as the force of gravity always really just an opposing force?

For instance, if you were to fall through the event horizon of a black hole then the conventional wisdom is that you wouldn't notice anything untoward in the process whatsoever. It would only be if you tried to get away from the horizon, in a rocket, for example, that the extreme curvature of spacetime, that the enormous effect of gravity, would become noticeable. But then feeling this would be due to your acceleration, and not to gravity. As such, then, if you don't feel gravity acting upon you even whilst you're in one of the strongest gravitational fields in the entire universe, then I wondered "Do you ever feel it?

There was a similar question asked here about whether or not we feel gravity well over a decade ago. But all the responses simply went along the lines of "Drop a hammer on your toe, and you'll feel gravity!" which, quite aside from being unnecessarily juvenile, is also quite clearly wrong! If you let go of a hammer here close to the surface of the Earth, then, for all intents and purposes, the hammer doesn't move anywhere in space whatsoever. Rather, it is the surface of the Earth that moves, rising at 9.8 m/s² with your toe stuck firmly to it, that comes up to hit the hammer! If you "drop" a hammer on your toe, therefore, you are experiencing acceleration, which is an absolute quantity, in conjunction with the electromagnetic force - as your toe comes into contact with the hammer - as opposed to feeling the effect of gravity pulling the hammer down onto your toe.

All of this seems relatively (boom, boom) straightforward, but there's a caveat. Because there is still a gravitational effect, though small, that draws the hammer down towards the centre of the Earth's mass (I believe that, sans acceleration, it would take around three hours before an object came to "rest" on the ground). And so, bearing this in mind, then, although 99.99% (and, yes, I just made that figure entirely up) of the impact of toe against hammer is due to the accelerated toe, what is the correct way to think about the gravitational effect here? If not for the acceleration, would both yourself and the hammer not be inertial? And so always maintain a spatial separation until acted on by a force? Or are two particles that go bump in the night actually experiencing gravity?

In short, can you ever truly feel gravity, or can you only ever experience opposing forces?

NB¹ General relativity is a precocious, demanding, and not to mention deceptive, mistress. Just when you think you understand her she'll suddenly smack you in the face again, and usually while screaming "Idiot!" at the top of her lungs. So, bearing this in mind, then, I've tried to be careful in how I've described her (take it from me, you don't want to say something like "Your gravity looks big in those jeans". That sort of thing never ends well! But, knowing me, I've still probably screwed up the description somehow, and so, if I have, then all I can say is, "Sorry, please don't hit me again!".

NB² I am an "armchair physicist", a complete layperson, and I hold no capacity whatsoever for mathematics wherein the number of summed digits exceeds the number of digits on my hands (and even then it can be problematic!), so any answers with equations in them, while doubtless proving worthwhile to others here, will be essentially meaningless to me. And, yes, I'm well aware that physics without math is an essentially meaningless concept in and of itself, but I'm an old dog, and well past learning new tricks. I came to physics late, too late, but I still derive an enormous amount of pleasure from understanding, as best I can, how the world works on a strictly intuitive level.

NB³ Oh, and just in case there's anybody out there who still has the "jump out of a plane and you'll feel gravity" mentality, I can assure you that you won't. There are a myriad of thought experiments one can conduct by which this can be fairly easily demonstrated, but, for brevity's sake, here is an actual experiment that anyone can do in order to prove it for themselves that, should you ever decide to jump out of a plane, you won't move anywhere: you have a phone. Your phone has an accelerometer built into it. Download an accelerometer app from your respective app store. Take a reading with the phone at "rest" on a table. Now push your phone off the table (such that it "falls" onto a cushion), and see what the lowest reading was. At "rest" on the table your phone will show that it was accelerating at around 9.8 m/s², and the reading as it "fell" will show 0.0 m/s. And it will show this because, when your phone appeared to be falling, it wasn't. It wasn't being accelerated, it wasn't actually moving, and it didn't, in fact, move anywhere in space at all! It's a whacky world, ain't it?

Thanks to anyone that read this far. I apologise for the "book" - writing more than is strictly necessary is a bad habit of mine. And finally, to anyone who can provide an answer to my question (one that my limited brain might be able to apprehend), then I thank you most gratefully in advance. My intuition is that we can't ever feel the effect of gravity, but then our human intuitions are almost always wrong, so... little help, please?

Avag'day, all!

♪♫︎ `𓅷´´ ♪♫︎♪

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Bodies in free-fall move along geodesic paths. You only feel gravity if something is pushing you away from that geodesic motion. The Earth is doing that for us (we want to get to the centre!), so we feel its gravity pushing on us. I think you get this, but I wanted to illustrate that it can be explained with less text than a book ;) $\endgroup$
    – m4r35n357
    Commented Dec 11 at 9:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just nitpicking here: gravity is a fictitious force as you clearly understand. Now in presence of an opposing force, such as the ground pressure, I fail to see how "feeling" that opposing force is any different from "feeling" the force of gravity. When analysing the system, you need all forces to make sense of what is happening - there is no duality regarding what is/is not "felt". The whole context is "felt". $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 11 at 10:16
  • $\begingroup$ @StéphaneRollandin I am using the word "feel" to represent something physically pushing on you. As with centrifugal force, in a non-inertial frame you need something to physically push on you to remain motionless in that frame. I know you know this, just trying to justify my terminology ;) $\endgroup$
    – m4r35n357
    Commented Dec 11 at 11:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @m4r35n357 My comment is intended for the OP, it is not for you:) $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 11 at 12:25

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

You are almost completely right.

What we do not and cannot feel is a uniform gravitational force. By “uniform” here I mean in the sense of general relativity where the force of gravity is just a fictitious force in flat spacetime. No fictitious force can ever be felt or produce any physically measurable effect of any kind.

The almost is because not all gravitational fields are uniform. A non-uniform gravitational field is the kind that is represented as curved spacetime. Such gravitational fields produce tidal forces that can be felt and measured.

Humans are pretty small, so it would require a pretty exotic gravitational field to be sufficiently curved for us to feel the tidal forces over our bodies

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.