3
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

They are both lattices, i.e., all the vectors are in the form of $m \vec{e}_1 + n\vec{e}_2 $ with $m$, $n$ integral.

The point groups are the same, i.e., D2

In which sense are they different? A primitive cell vs a composite cell?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Draw a Wigner-Seitz unit cell. That atom in the middle changes the symmetry. $\endgroup$
    – Jon Custer
    Commented Nov 8 at 4:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "with m, n integral" is clearly false for the centred rectangular lattice. With both as odd half integers would also work. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 8 at 4:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yeah: the primitive unit cells are very different: one is a rectangle and the other is merely a parallelogram. @naturallyInconsistent I suspect that OP means that $\vec{e}_1$ and $\vec{e}_2$ are different for the two cases. In the second, we could take $\vec{e}_1 = a\hat{x}$ and $\vec{e}_2 = \frac{a}{2}\hat{x} + \frac{b}{2}\hat{y}$, and then every lattice point is an integer linear combination of these. While $\hat{e}_j$ might be the symbols used for the standard basis mathematically, I think that's just not the assumption here. $\endgroup$
    – march
    Commented Nov 8 at 5:06
  • $\begingroup$ @march I really dont think your alternative $\vec e_2$ is what is being meant, because then the OP ought to ask that for all the different lattices, not just the rect v.s. centred rect. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 8 at 5:11
  • $\begingroup$ @naturallyInconsistent I see what you mean. Perhaps, then, that's where the OP's confusion lies. This seems to be the viewpoint of the answer that's been posted. $\endgroup$
    – march
    Commented Nov 8 at 16:17

1 Answer 1

10
$\begingroup$

A primitive cell, by definition, contains only one lattice point. A Bravais lattice in 2D is the set of all the points obtained by all the integer combinations of two independent displacement vectors $\bf a$ and $\bf b$ in the plane $$ {\bf R} = n_1{\bf a} + n_2{\bf b} ,~~~~~~n_1, n_2 \in {\mathbb Z}. $$

A two-site lattice like the oc lattice in your picture cannot be considered immediately as a Bravais lattice because the centers of the rectangles are not integer combinations of the displacements along the two sides of the rectangle. However, it turns out that it is one of the five Bravais lattices in 2D because, with references to the vectors $\bf a$ and $\bf b$ as in the figure, the set $\bf a$ and ${\bf b'} = \frac12 {\bf a} + \frac12 {\bf b}$ allows a description of all the lattice points as integer combination of these two displacements.

The reason why it is a Bravais lattice different from the general oblique lattice obtained with two generic displacements $\bf a$ and $\bf b$ with $|{\bf a}| \neq |{\bf b}| $ and forming an angle different from $\pm 90^{\circ}$ is that the oc lattice has two mirror reflections, as symmetry elements, absent in the general oblique lattice. On the other hand, it is distinct from the rectangular lattice because $\bf a$ and $\bf b$ are not orthogonal.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.