1
$\begingroup$

Consider a theory containing a Dirac field $\psi$ and a scalar field $\varphi$ where the only interaction is given by a Yukawa potential $$ V = -g\bar{\psi}\varphi\psi $$ I know that real scalar fields cannot couple to the electromagnetic field because their Noether current density $$\mathcal{J}^\mu = \varphi\partial^\mu\varphi - \varphi\partial^\mu\varphi$$ under the $\text{U}(1)$ symmetry of the EM field vanishes and therefore there is no coupling (cf. this question). Is the reason that the real scalar field theory is not invariant under $\text{U}(1)$ transformations at all?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $V$ has to be real. What does this imply for $\varphi$? $\endgroup$
    – Prahar
    Commented Jun 12 at 20:53
  • $\begingroup$ it implies that $\varphi$ must be real. thanks! $\endgroup$
    – paulina
    Commented Jun 12 at 20:57

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The current $\bar\psi \gamma^\mu \psi$ will be equal to zero if $\psi$ is a Majorana fermion. This condition is the fermion analogue of being "real."

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I am looking explicitly for the case where $\psi$ is a Dirac fermion. $\endgroup$
    – paulina
    Commented Jun 12 at 13:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Then I do not understand your question. Perhaps you say what you mean by a "similar argument"? What are you trying to show? $\endgroup$
    – mike stone
    Commented Jun 12 at 13:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I just realized that the way I wrote it makes no sense. I will think about it again and then edit the question accordingly. $\endgroup$
    – paulina
    Commented Jun 12 at 13:53
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Wow, reminding me of congressmen talking PASS each other. $\endgroup$
    – MadMax
    Commented Jun 12 at 14:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.