1
$\begingroup$

I got the following from Thomson’s Modern Particle Physics and some other sources.

The factor 5/18 distinguishing electron-DIS and neutrino scattering experiments is a basic proof for quarks and their charges. As I understand, you use isospin symmetry to set $u_n(x) = d_p(x)$, which should be only an approximation since their mass is not identical, and you neglect contributions from s- and sea quarks. Then you take the average of the structure function for the deuteron: $F_2^d = (F_2^p + F_2^n)/2$. The 5/18 results from (4/9 + 1/9)/2, i.e. essentially the sum of z^2, the square of the charges of u + d divided by 2.

If you’d average over all p and n quarks the sum for $z_i^2$ of p + n would be: (4/9+4/9+1/9 + 1/9+1/9+4/9) = 15/9 which in turn would give as average over 6 quarks: 15/(9*6) = 5/18, i.e. the same value. Is this coincidence? Wouldn’t that be the easier way with fewer assumptions?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ what factor of 5/18? $\endgroup$
    – JEB
    Commented Dec 19, 2023 at 23:05
  • $\begingroup$ see e.g. here, starting slide 6: physi.uni-heidelberg.de/~uwer/lectures/ParticlePhysics/… $\endgroup$
    – qatch
    Commented Dec 20, 2023 at 12:28
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I know what it is. Most ppl don't. It should be in the question..is it a ratio of total cross section, some structure function, and is that structure function CC or NC? $\endgroup$
    – JEB
    Commented Dec 20, 2023 at 15:50
  • $\begingroup$ I've added a little bit to make it clearer. Though I am not familiar enough with the subject to do more. $\endgroup$
    – qatch
    Commented Dec 21, 2023 at 14:01

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

It is not a coincidence that the two methods give the same answer, since assuming a deuteron has 3 $u$ and 3 $d$ quarks is just a specific case of assuming equal numbers of $u$ and $d$ quarks. Any equal number of $u$ and $d$ quarks will give the 5/18 factor.

Only considering valence quarks might give the same 5/18 factor as assuming isospin invariance, but only by ignoring much of the quark content of the deuteron. Both your lines of reasoning ignore $s$ and $\bar{s}$ sea quarks, but assuming a deuteron specifically has 3 up and 3 down quarks has an additional assumption. Either there is no contribution from any sea quarks, including $u$, $\bar{u}$, $d$ and $\bar{d}$ sea quarks, which is wrong, or any such contributions are equal, which means you can't avoid assuming isospin invariance.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.